Prague
Continental Cup 2022

Continental Cup Prague 2022

April 28, 2022

158 Athletes

Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.

    Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty

    S1

    Z: (20) 1531 T: (17) 1607

    S3

    Z: (15) 1695 T: (09) 1800

    S4

    Z: (21) 1501 T: (12) 1730

    S2

    Z: (14) 1697 T: (05) 1885
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.

The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
AthletePre-Elo1
1607
2
1885
3
1695
4
1730
Event ScorePost-Elo
1 J KRUDER SLO ▲ 3 better than predicted15121Z 1T
▲ 13 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 19 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 17 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 13 Elo
100.01574
1 S GEJO SRB 15611Z 1T
▲ 11 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 17 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 14 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 11 Elo
100.01614
3 L SKUSEK SLO 15441Z 1T
▲ 17 Elo
2Z 2T
▲ 10 Elo
3Z 3T
▼ 11 Elo
3Z 4T
▼ 30 Elo
98.91530
4 Y TAUB ISR ▲ 9 better than predicted14102Z 2T
▲ 5 Elo
2Z 2T
▲ 15 Elo
3Z 3T
▲ 6 Elo
3Z 4T
▼ 4 Elo
98.71432
5 M PÖTZI AUT ▲ 9 better than predicted14681Z 1T
▲ 14 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 19 Elo
1Z 2T
▲ 14 Elo
5Z
▼ 52 Elo
84.51463
6 E HAMMELMÜLL. AUT ▲ 1 better than predicted15404Z 4T
▼ 35 Elo
3Z
▼ 21 Elo
3Z 4T
▼ 3 Elo
1Z 1T
▲ 17 Elo
83.71498
7 A CALLIET FRA ▼ 6 worse than predicted14701Z 1T
▲ 21 Elo
-
▼ 75 Elo
4Z 4T
▲ 0 Elo
2Z 3T
▲ 11 Elo
74.11433
8 E ADAMOVSKA CZE at home ▼ 3 worse than predicted15071Z 1T
▲ 12 Elo
1Z
▼ 3 Elo
2Z
▼ 21 Elo
2Z 2T
▲ 6 Elo
69.71501
8 S V.ESSEN NED ▲ 6 better than predicted14691Z 1T
▲ 20 Elo
1Z
▼ 3 Elo
2Z 2T
▲ 14 Elo
2Z
▼ 32 Elo
69.71468
10 S E.MIMOUNE FRA Top 10 16432Z
▼ 66 Elo
1Z
▼ 16 Elo
4Z 4T
▼ 24 Elo
1Z 3T
▲ 8 Elo
69.11545
11 Z EGLI SUI ▲ 6 better than predicted14711Z 1T
▲ 14 Elo
-
▼ 46 Elo
1Z
▼ 3 Elo
3Z 3T
▲ 0 Elo
59.61440
12 N BÄRTSCHI SUI ▼ 4 worse than predicted14972Z 2T
▼ 1 Elo
-
▼ 32 Elo
2Z
▼ 12 Elo
2Z 2T
▲ 8 Elo
59.51464
13 L KLEM NED ▲ 7 better than predicted13081Z 1T
▲ 30 Elo
1Z
▲ 13 Elo
1Z
▲ 6 Elo
6Z
▼ 36 Elo
54.51321
14 S LETTNER AUT ▼ 8 worse than predicted14951Z 2T
▲ 5 Elo
3Z
▼ 8 Elo
5Z
▼ 30 Elo
3Z
▼ 23 Elo
54.11439
15 E MCNEICE GBR Top 10 ▲ 1 better than predicted14645Z 6T
▼ 56 Elo
2Z
▲ 3 Elo
2Z
▼ 3 Elo
5Z
▼ 35 Elo
53.51373
16 I KINDLIHAGE. NOR ▼ 7 worse than predicted13872Z 3T
▲ 3 Elo
-
▼ 26 Elo
-
▼ 30 Elo
5Z 5T
▼ 3 Elo
48.91337
17 A APEL GER ▲ 1 better than predicted14655Z 5T
▼ 42 Elo
6Z
▼ 19 Elo
-
▼ 52 Elo
1Z
▼ 3 Elo
43.71354
18 L FLOCKHART GBR ▲ 1 better than predicted14633Z
▼ 40 Elo
-
▼ 37 Elo
-
▼ 35 Elo
2Z 2T
▲ 25 Elo
34.61383
19 S ØVRE-EIDE NOR ▲ 2 better than predicted13331Z 1T
▲ 30 Elo
-
▼ 32 Elo
-
▼ 34 Elo
7Z
▼ 21 Elo
34.41282
20 T SLEMENSEK SLO ▼ 9 worse than predicted16014Z
▼ 56 Elo
2Z
▼ 3 Elo
-
▼ 41 Elo
3Z
▼ 24 Elo
29.41481
21 S HAAVE NOR ▼ 9 worse than predicted1575-
▼ 55 Elo
-
▼ 37 Elo
-
▼ 27 Elo
1Z
▲ 3 Elo
10.01473
HSF Logo

1.3.5_m.14

hadesoft@proton.me