Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S4
Z: (11) 1931 ■ T: (02) 2097 ■
COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1653.6)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1647.3)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1656.1)COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1899.8)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1894.6)DYNAMIC■ DYNAMIC (1898.7)
S1
Z: (20) 1704 ■ T: (15) 1872 ■
COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1392.8)COORDINATION■ COORDINATION (1565.3)
S3
Z: (11) 1903 ■ T: (01) 2087 ■
POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1635.0)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1635.0)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1635.0)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1913.6)TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1913.6)POWERFUL■ POWERFUL (1913.6)
S2
Z: (19) 1669 ■ T: (16) 1783 ■
DELICATE■, DELICATE (1398.9)DELICATE■ DELICATE (1517.2)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1872 | 2 1783 | 3 2087 | 4 1931 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 J GARNBRET SLO Top 10 ▲ 9 better than predicted | 1990 | 1Z 1T ▲ 3 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 2 Elo | 3Z 3T ▼ 51 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 9 Elo | 99.6 | 1953 |
| 2 N GROSSMAN USA ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1936 | 1Z 1T ▲ 3 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 2 Elo | 1Z ▼ 42 Elo | 4Z 4T ▼ 65 Elo | 84.4 | 1834 |
| 3 O BERTONE FRA Top 10 ▲ 9 better than predicted | 1708 | 1Z 1T ▲ 9 Elo | 1Z 2T ▼ 6 Elo | 1Z ▼ 11 Elo | 2Z ▼ 35 Elo | 69.8 | 1665 |
| 4 S GEJO SRB ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1737 | 2Z 4T ▼ 49 Elo | 2Z 4T ▼ 41 Elo | 2Z ▼ 13 Elo | 4Z ▼ 37 Elo | 68.8 | 1597 |
| 5 A KÜMIN SUI at home ▲ 15 better than predicted | 1678 | 1Z 1T ▲ 12 Elo | 1Z 2T ▼ 2 Elo | - ▼ 73 Elo | 4Z ▼ 28 Elo | 59.6 | 1594 |
| 6 H MEUL GER ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1751 | 3Z 4T ▼ 56 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 10 Elo | 1Z ▲ 1 Elo | - ▼ 76 Elo | 59.5 | 1637 |
| 7 F ITO JPN ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1817 | 3Z 3T ▼ 56 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 8 Elo | - ▼ 82 Elo | 4Z ▼ 42 Elo | 59.3 | 1653 |
| 8 F GIBERT FRA ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1678 | 1Z 4T ▼ 16 Elo | 3Z 3T ▼ 37 Elo | 4Z ▼ 14 Elo | - ▼ 46 Elo | 59.0 | 1569 |
| 9 M RICHARDSON CAN ▲ 9 better than predicted | 1580 | 5Z 5T ▼ 42 Elo | 6Z 6T ▼ 58 Elo | 2Z ▲ 9 Elo | - ▼ 24 Elo | 58.1 | 1468 |
| 10 B RABOUTOU USA ▼ 7 worse than predicted | 1789 | 2Z ▼ 76 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 12 Elo | 2Z ▼ 8 Elo | 1Z ▼ 1 Elo | 54.8 | 1716 |
| 11 C MORONI ITA ▬ | 1712 | 2Z ▼ 51 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 14 Elo | 2Z ▼ 2 Elo | 7Z ▼ 24 Elo | 54.1 | 1649 |
| 12 C COSCOY USA ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1549 | 2Z 2T ▲ 13 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 7 Elo | - ▼ 43 Elo | - ▼ 39 Elo | 49.6 | 1495 |
| 13 C SEO KOR ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 1594 | 4Z 4T ▼ 36 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 4 Elo | - ▼ 32 Elo | - ▼ 36 Elo | 49.2 | 1503 |
| 14 C CAULIER BEL ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1706 | 2Z ▼ 38 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 2 Elo | 1Z ▲ 6 Elo | - ▼ 41 Elo | 44.8 | 1639 |
| 15 K CULLEN USA ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1609 | 2Z 2T ▲ 12 Elo | 1Z ▼ 33 Elo | - ▼ 39 Elo | 4Z ▲ 4 Elo | 44.5 | 1557 |
| 16 J PILZ AUT ▼ 12 worse than predicted | 1651 | 4Z 5T ▼ 16 Elo | 2Z ▼ 52 Elo | - ▼ 23 Elo | 2Z ▲ 10 Elo | 44.1 | 1573 |
| 17 A KEREM ISR ▼ 8 worse than predicted | 1682 | 7Z ▼ 81 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 3 Elo | 4Z ▼ 6 Elo | - ▼ 27 Elo | 43.9 | 1568 |
| 18 F STERRER AUT ▼ 11 worse than predicted | 1650 | 1Z 4T ▲ 12 Elo | 7Z ▼ 117 Elo | - ▼ 30 Elo | 5Z ▲ 6 Elo | 43.0 | 1524 |
| 19 L DÖRFFEL GER ▬ | 1611 | 3Z ▼ 24 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 24 Elo | - ▼ 34 Elo | - ▼ 26 Elo | 34.8 | 1558 |
| 20 S SA KOR ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1784 | 3Z 3T ▼ 16 Elo | - ▼ 142 Elo | - ▼ 33 Elo | - ▼ 26 Elo | 24.6 | 1582 |