Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
F1
Z: (03) 1878 ■ T: (01) 1972 ■
TECHNICAL■, TECHNICAL (1574.1)PRESS■, PRESS (1574.4)PRESS■, PRESS (1810.1)TECHNICAL■ TECHNICAL (1809.6)
F3
Z: (05) 1534 ■ T: (04) 1608 ■
DELICATE■, DELICATE (1429.9)DELICATE■ DELICATE (1516.4)
F4
Z: (02) 1841 ■ T: (02) 1831 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1593.4)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1594.4)POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1707.7)DYNAMIC■ DYNAMIC (1707.2)
F2
Z: (05) 1716 ■ T: (02) 1881 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1506.4)DYNAMIC■ DYNAMIC (1720.6)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1972 | 2 1881 | 3 1608 | 4 1831 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 J GARNBRET SLO Top 10 ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1953 | 2Z 2T ▼ 21 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 6 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 4 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 8 Elo | 99.8 | 1950 |
| 2 N GROSSMAN USA ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1834 | 7Z ▼ 114 Elo | 6Z 6T ▼ 82 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 15 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 23 Elo | 83.3 | 1676 |
| 3 A KÜMIN SUI at home ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1594 | - ▼ 30 Elo | 2Z ▼ 21 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 19 Elo | - ▼ 65 Elo | 34.9 | 1506 |
| 4 O BERTONE FRA Top 10 ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1665 | - ▼ 53 Elo | 4Z ▼ 43 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 16 Elo | - ▼ 59 Elo | 34.7 | 1535 |
| 5 F ITO JPN ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1653 | 4Z ▼ 19 Elo | - ▼ 80 Elo | 4Z ▼ 68 Elo | - ▼ 34 Elo | 19.4 | 1460 |
| 6 S GEJO SRB ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1597 | - ▼ 32 Elo | 3Z ▼ 11 Elo | - ▼ 39 Elo | - ▼ 41 Elo | 9.8 | 1491 |