Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S4
Z: (20) 1630 ■ T: (07) 1981 ■
POWERFUL■, POWERFUL (1391.0)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1376.0)FINGERS■, FINGERS (1391.3)PINCH■, PINCH (1391.0)PINCH■, PINCH (1771.6)FINGERS■, FINGERS (1775.1)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1763.4)POWERFUL■ POWERFUL (1771.6)
S3
Z: (16) 1878 ■ T: (08) 2011 ■
DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1577.6)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1579.0)COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1577.6)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1758.7)SLOPER■, SLOPER (1760.1)COORDINATION■ COORDINATION (1758.7)
S1
Z: (20) 1536 ■ T: (09) 1990 ■
DELICATE■, DELICATE (1264.6)FINGERS■, FINGERS (1264.6)DELICATE■, DELICATE (1710.1)FINGERS■ FINGERS (1710.1)
S2
Z: (19) 1727 ■ T: (09) 1990 ■
COORDINATION■, COORDINATION (1452.1)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1452.1)DYNAMIC■, DYNAMIC (1729.8)COORDINATION■ COORDINATION (1729.8)
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1536 | 2 1990 | 3 2011 | 4 1630 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 K FUJII JPN ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1689 | 1Z 1T ▲ 13 Elo | 2Z 5T ▼ 38 Elo | 4Z 5T ▼ 48 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 18 Elo | 98.8 | 1634 |
| 2 T NARASAKI JPN Top 10 ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1848 | 1Z 4T ▼ 34 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 9 Elo | 6Z 6T ▼ 105 Elo | 3Z 3T ▼ 36 Elo | 98.3 | 1682 |
| 3 M SCHALCK FRA Top 10 ▲ 8 better than predicted | 1689 | 1Z 4T ▼ 12 Elo | 1Z ▼ 51 Elo | 2Z 3T ▲ 3 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 18 Elo | 84.4 | 1647 |
| 4 C DUFFY USA ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1688 | 4Z ▼ 119 Elo | 2Z 4T ▼ 4 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 8 Elo | 3Z 3T ▼ 19 Elo | 83.5 | 1554 |
| 5 Y OGATA JPN ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1732 | 1Z ▼ 45 Elo | 3Z ▼ 69 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 12 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 9 Elo | 69.5 | 1639 |
| 6 P JENFT FRA Top 10 ▲ 10 better than predicted | 1545 | 1Z 1T ▲ 38 Elo | 1Z 4T ▲ 17 Elo | 3Z ▼ 46 Elo | 2Z ▼ 45 Elo | 69.4 | 1509 |
| 7 Y FUJIWAKI JPN ▲ 7 better than predicted | 1738 | 2Z ▼ 56 Elo | 1Z 4T ▼ 1 Elo | 4Z ▼ 55 Elo | 2Z 4T ▼ 13 Elo | 68.9 | 1613 |
| 8 M MILNE GBR ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1637 | 1Z 3T ▲ 13 Elo | 7Z ▼ 92 Elo | 6Z 6T ▼ 15 Elo | 3Z ▼ 41 Elo | 67.7 | 1502 |
| 9 K DOHI JPN ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1843 | 1Z 1T ▲ 13 Elo | 1Z 3T ▼ 7 Elo | - ▼ 136 Elo | 1Z ▼ 42 Elo | 59.8 | 1681 |
| 10 M CORNU FRA ▲ 10 better than predicted | 1631 | 2Z 3T ▲ 0 Elo | 4Z 4T ▼ 19 Elo | - ▼ 53 Elo | 4Z ▼ 44 Elo | 58.8 | 1519 |
| 11 G VEZONIK SLO ▲ 7 better than predicted | 1638 | 1Z 3T ▲ 14 Elo | 1Z ▼ 17 Elo | 7Z ▼ 28 Elo | 2Z ▼ 23 Elo | 54.0 | 1584 |
| 12 N UZNIK AUT ▬ | 1671 | 5Z ▼ 74 Elo | 2Z ▼ 25 Elo | 5Z ▼ 15 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 13 Elo | 53.9 | 1570 |
| 12 T TAKATA JPN ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1640 | 2Z ▼ 30 Elo | 4Z ▼ 33 Elo | 4Z 5T ▲ 17 Elo | 1Z ▼ 10 Elo | 53.9 | 1584 |
| 14 A MEGOS GER ▼ 7 worse than predicted | 1719 | 1Z ▼ 25 Elo | 1Z ▼ 18 Elo | 5Z 7T ▼ 7 Elo | 3Z ▼ 41 Elo | 53.8 | 1628 |
| 15 M MAWEM FRA ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1676 | 1Z 2T ▲ 17 Elo | 4Z ▼ 53 Elo | 7Z ▼ 33 Elo | 4Z ▼ 49 Elo | 53.7 | 1558 |
| 16 B HANNA USA ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1564 | 2Z ▼ 17 Elo | 4Z 6T ▲ 2 Elo | 6Z ▼ 10 Elo | 1Z ▼ 3 Elo | 53.6 | 1536 |
| 17 A PEHARC SLO ▼ 14 worse than predicted | 1684 | 2Z ▼ 32 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 13 Elo | - ▼ 50 Elo | 3Z ▼ 27 Elo | 44.5 | 1592 |
| 18 J KRUDER SLO ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1618 | 1Z ▼ 3 Elo | 7Z ▼ 49 Elo | 5Z ▼ 4 Elo | 2Z ▼ 8 Elo | 38.7 | 1554 |
| 19 G BARATZADEH IRI ▬ | 1638 | 1Z ▼ 7 Elo | - ▼ 64 Elo | 1Z ▲ 8 Elo | 5Z ▼ 35 Elo | 29.6 | 1546 |
| 20 Z L.SUDAR SLO ▼ 10 worse than predicted | 1676 | 2Z ▼ 27 Elo | 2Z ▼ 12 Elo | - ▼ 42 Elo | 4Z ▼ 28 Elo | 29.5 | 1571 |