Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
F3
Z: (05) 1621 ■ T: (02) 1849 ■
F4
Z: (05) 1595 ■ T: (04) 1683 ■
F1
Z: (01) 1963 ■ T: (01) 1951 ■
F2
Z: (06) 1580 ■ T: (04) 1705 ■
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1963 | 2 1580 | 3 1849 | 4 1595 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 K FUJII JPN ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1715 | 1Z 1T ▲ 23 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 20 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 15 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 17 Elo | 99.6 | 1716 |
| 2 T NARASAKI JPN Top 10 ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1765 | - ▼ 83 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 15 Elo | 3Z 3T ▼ 25 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 15 Elo | 74.4 | 1665 |
| 3 M CORNU FRA ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1625 | - ▼ 55 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 18 Elo | 1Z ▼ 22 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 18 Elo | 60.0 | 1587 |
| 4 A RUBTSOV RUS ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1638 | - ▼ 50 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 7 Elo | 1Z ▼ 28 Elo | 3Z 5T ▼ 35 Elo | 59.3 | 1535 |
| 5 N MARCUS ISR ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1581 | - ▼ 34 Elo | 5Z ▼ 74 Elo | 4Z ▼ 25 Elo | - ▼ 58 Elo | 19.3 | 1398 |
| 6 A PEHARC SLO ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1649 | - ▼ 39 Elo | 5Z ▼ 75 Elo | - ▼ 73 Elo | 5Z ▼ 43 Elo | 19.2 | 1428 |