Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S2
Z: (20) 1908 ■ T: (19) 2008 ■
S3
Z: (20) 1774 ■ T: (14) 2124 ■
S4
Z: (15) 2032 ■ T: (03) 2371 ■
S1
Z: (19) 1895 ■ T: (06) 2241 ■
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1895 | 2 2008 | 3 2124 | 4 2371 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 K FUJII JPN ▲ 2 better than predicted | 2024 | 1Z 3T ▲ 14 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 14 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 17 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 15 Elo | 99.6 | 2084 |
| 2 Y OGATA JPN ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1928 | 1Z ▲ 4 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 20 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 14 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 26 Elo | 84.8 | 1992 |
| 3 T NARASAKI JPN Top 10 ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 2117 | 1Z 1T ▲ 9 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 9 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 6 Elo | 2Z ▼ 14 Elo | 84.7 | 2109 |
| 4 N COLEMAN USA ▲ 9 better than predicted | 1843 | 5Z ▼ 25 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 26 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 27 Elo | 2Z 3T ▲ 22 Elo | 84.3 | 1893 |
| 5 N UZNIK AUT at home ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1864 | 1Z 2T ▲ 28 Elo | 4Z 4T ▼ 27 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 19 Elo | 5Z ▼ 22 Elo | 83.8 | 1862 |
| 6 S LORENZI BEL ▲ 9 better than predicted | 1891 | 2Z 3T ▲ 14 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 4 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 8 Elo | - ▼ 42 Elo | 74.3 | 1881 |
| 7 A RUBTSOV RUS ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1883 | 1Z 3T ▲ 22 Elo | 5Z 5T ▼ 39 Elo | 3Z 3T ▼ 5 Elo | - ▼ 30 Elo | 73.6 | 1835 |
| 8 J CHON KOR ▼ 7 worse than predicted | 2121 | 2Z ▼ 17 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 6 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 5 Elo | 1Z ▼ 9 Elo | 69.9 | 2106 |
| 9 R SUGIMOTO JPN ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1832 | 1Z ▲ 7 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 18 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 15 Elo | 1Z ▲ 5 Elo | 69.7 | 1877 |
| 10 C DUFFY USA ▲ 6 better than predicted | 1775 | 1Z 2T ▲ 46 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 22 Elo | 1Z ▼ 30 Elo | 1Z ▲ 13 Elo | 69.7 | 1826 |
| 11 Y FLOHÉ GER ▲ 8 better than predicted | 1767 | 2Z ▲ 0 Elo | 2Z 4T ▲ 8 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 28 Elo | 1Z ▲ 11 Elo | 69.5 | 1814 |
| 12 A MEGOS GER ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1857 | 1Z ▼ 7 Elo | 4Z 4T ▼ 17 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 19 Elo | 3Z ▼ 4 Elo | 69.1 | 1848 |
| 13 K HARADA JPN ▼ 7 worse than predicted | 1950 | 3Z ▼ 30 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 20 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 19 Elo | - ▼ 63 Elo | 59.8 | 1902 |
| 14 J SCHUBERT AUT at home ▼ 9 worse than predicted | 1957 | 2Z ▼ 15 Elo | 3Z 3T ▼ 19 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 11 Elo | - ▼ 32 Elo | 59.4 | 1908 |
| 15 S AMAGASA JPN ▼ 7 worse than predicted | 1891 | 1Z ▲ 4 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 22 Elo | 3Z ▼ 56 Elo | 1Z ▲ 9 Elo | 54.8 | 1870 |
| 16 M MAWEM FRA ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 1858 | 2Z ▼ 4 Elo | 2Z 5T ▼ 7 Elo | 1Z ▼ 19 Elo | 1Z ▲ 10 Elo | 54.4 | 1838 |
| 17 T TAKATA JPN ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1736 | 2Z ▲ 4 Elo | 6Z ▼ 39 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 28 Elo | 3Z ▲ 8 Elo | 54.1 | 1737 |
| 18 A PEHARC SLO ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1897 | 4Z ▼ 32 Elo | 3Z 4T ▼ 10 Elo | 2Z ▼ 23 Elo | 4Z ▼ 2 Elo | 53.8 | 1830 |
| 19 J HOJER GER ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1819 | - ▼ 20 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 16 Elo | 1Z ▼ 10 Elo | 1Z ▲ 11 Elo | 44.8 | 1824 |
| 20 M SCHALCK FRA Top 10 ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1922 | 2Z ▼ 14 Elo | 2Z 6T ▼ 28 Elo | 1Z ▼ 27 Elo | - ▼ 37 Elo | 44.3 | 1823 |