Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
SW1
Z: (18) 1914 ■ T: (08) 2235 ■
SW2
Z: (07) 2260 ■ T: (06) 2293 ■
SW3
Z: (16) 2025 ■ T: (01) 2390 ■
SW4
Z: (16) 1923 ■ T: (06) 2237 ■
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | W1 2235 | W2 2260 | W3 2390 | W4 2237 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 J GARNBRET SLO Top 10 ▬ | 2218 | 1Z 1T ▲ 6 Elo | 3Z 3T ▼ 11 Elo | 3Z ▼ 28 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 8 Elo | 84.4 | 2193 |
| 2 O BERTONE FRA Top 10 ▲ 10 better than predicted | 1792 | 2Z 4T ▲ 31 Elo | 1Z ▲ 5 Elo | 2Z ▲ 10 Elo | 1Z 4T ▲ 38 Elo | 69.2 | 1876 |
| 3 M NONAKA JPN ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1967 | 2Z 4T ▲ 3 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 16 Elo | 5Z ▼ 32 Elo | 1Z ▼ 4 Elo | 68.8 | 1950 |
| 4 N GROSSMAN USA at home ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1987 | 1Z 5T ▲ 1 Elo | - ▼ 54 Elo | 1Z ▲ 6 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 20 Elo | 59.4 | 1964 |
| 5 B RABOUTOU USA at home ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1886 | 1Z ▼ 9 Elo | - ▼ 36 Elo | 4Z 4T ▲ 17 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 30 Elo | 59.4 | 1891 |
| 5 S GEJO SRB ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1847 | 1Z 1T ▲ 30 Elo | 3Z 4T ▲ 22 Elo | 2Z ▲ 1 Elo | - ▼ 60 Elo | 59.4 | 1846 |
| 7 K DEBEVEC SLO ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1784 | 2Z ▼ 8 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 32 Elo | 3Z ▲ 1 Elo | 2Z ▼ 3 Elo | 54.2 | 1806 |
| 8 K CONDIE USA at home ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1714 | 1Z ▲ 5 Elo | 2Z 7T ▲ 31 Elo | 7Z ▼ 9 Elo | 1Z ▲ 8 Elo | 53.3 | 1749 |
| 9 F ITO JPN ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1981 | 1Z ▼ 24 Elo | - ▼ 49 Elo | 5Z ▼ 21 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 28 Elo | 44.6 | 1918 |
| 10 F GIBERT FRA ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1892 | 1Z 3T ▲ 21 Elo | - ▼ 37 Elo | 4Z ▼ 10 Elo | 1Z ▼ 5 Elo | 44.5 | 1864 |
| 11 P KLINGLER SUI ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1800 | 1Z ▼ 1 Elo | 2Z 5T ▲ 30 Elo | 2Z ▲ 7 Elo | - ▼ 51 Elo | 44.4 | 1791 |
| 12 A HÖNIG GER ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1765 | 3Z 4T ▲ 13 Elo | - ▼ 18 Elo | 2Z ▲ 10 Elo | 2Z ▲ 1 Elo | 44.3 | 1773 |
| 13 C MORONI ITA ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1732 | 4Z 6T ▲ 7 Elo | - ▼ 16 Elo | 4Z ▲ 4 Elo | 2Z ▲ 4 Elo | 43.8 | 1733 |
| 14 M NAKAMURA JPN ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1803 | 1Z ▼ 3 Elo | - ▼ 21 Elo | - ▼ 33 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 31 Elo | 34.8 | 1783 |
| 15 H MEUL GER ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1732 | 7Z ▼ 30 Elo | - ▼ 11 Elo | 2Z ▲ 13 Elo | 1Z ▲ 10 Elo | 29.3 | 1715 |
| 16 V LUKAN SLO ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1603 | 4Z ▲ 1 Elo | - ▼ 6 Elo | - ▼ 14 Elo | 2Z ▲ 12 Elo | 19.6 | 1598 |
| 16 K CULLEN USA at home ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1705 | 2Z ▲ 2 Elo | - ▼ 16 Elo | 4Z ▲ 9 Elo | - ▼ 50 Elo | 19.6 | 1656 |
| 18 A NOGUCHI JPN ▼ 7 worse than predicted | 1718 | - ▼ 45 Elo | - ▼ 9 Elo | 7Z ▲ 1 Elo | 4Z ▲ 0 Elo | 19.1 | 1670 |
| 19 R NAKAGAWA JPN ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1585 | 7Z ▼ 3 Elo | - ▼ 8 Elo | - ▼ 18 Elo | 4Z ▲ 14 Elo | 18.9 | 1573 |
| 20 F STERRER AUT ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1678 | - ▼ 34 Elo | - ▼ 7 Elo | - ▼ 16 Elo | - ▼ 26 Elo | 0.0 | 1604 |