Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
SM1
Z: (20) 1709 ■ T: (18) 1837 ■
SM3
Z: (20) 1840 ■ T: (17) 1943 ■
SM4
Z: (20) 1841 ■ T: (04) 2308 ■
SM2
Z: (18) 1988 ■ T: (07) 2219 ■
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | M1 1709 | M2 1988 | M3 1840 | M4 1841 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 T NARASAKI JPN Top 10 ▬ | 2132 | 1Z 2T ▼ 3 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 4 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 4 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 5 Elo | 99.7 | 2142 |
| 2 S BAILEY USA at home ▲ 12 better than predicted | 1724 | 1Z 2T ▲ 25 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 20 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 17 Elo | 6Z 6T ▼ 5 Elo | 98.3 | 1781 |
| 3 Y OGATA JPN ▬ | 1706 | 1Z 1T ▲ 29 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 30 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 27 Elo | 1Z ▲ 2 Elo | 84.9 | 1794 |
| 4 Z GALLA USA at home ▲ 12 better than predicted | 1740 | 1Z 1T ▲ 29 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 32 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 26 Elo | 6Z ▼ 32 Elo | 84.5 | 1795 |
| 5 K FUJII JPN ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1877 | 1Z 1T ▲ 19 Elo | 4Z ▼ 41 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 21 Elo | 1Z 5T ▲ 20 Elo | 84.3 | 1896 |
| 6 M MILNE GBR ▲ 14 better than predicted | 1617 | 2Z 2T ▲ 23 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 27 Elo | 4Z 4T ▲ 4 Elo | 4Z ▼ 1 Elo | 83.5 | 1670 |
| 7 M CORNU FRA ▲ 8 better than predicted | 1661 | 1Z 2T ▲ 25 Elo | 7Z ▼ 19 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 30 Elo | 2Z 6T ▲ 25 Elo | 83.3 | 1722 |
| 8 S AMAGASA JPN ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1737 | 1Z 2T ▲ 18 Elo | 2Z ▼ 3 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 14 Elo | 2Z ▼ 1 Elo | 69.6 | 1765 |
| 9 M SCHALCK FRA Top 10 ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1881 | 3Z ▼ 102 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 43 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 29 Elo | 4Z ▼ 37 Elo | 69.4 | 1814 |
| 10 N COLEMAN USA at home ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1752 | 1Z 1T ▲ 25 Elo | 3Z ▼ 15 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 6 Elo | 3Z ▼ 5 Elo | 69.4 | 1763 |
| 11 A RUBTSOV RUS ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1762 | 1Z 1T ▲ 24 Elo | 6Z ▼ 33 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 6 Elo | 1Z ▲ 5 Elo | 69.3 | 1764 |
| 11 A MEGOS GER ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1779 | 2Z 2T ▲ 4 Elo | 3Z ▼ 10 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 2 Elo | 2Z ▼ 2 Elo | 69.3 | 1773 |
| 13 A WATERHOUSE GBR ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1623 | 1Z 1T ▲ 45 Elo | 7Z ▼ 19 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 45 Elo | 3Z ▲ 1 Elo | 69.2 | 1695 |
| 13 S LORENZI BEL ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1838 | 1Z 1T ▲ 19 Elo | 6Z ▼ 43 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 9 Elo | 3Z ▼ 14 Elo | 69.2 | 1809 |
| 15 N UZNIK AUT ▼ 8 worse than predicted | 1816 | 2Z ▼ 36 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 18 Elo | 4Z 4T ▼ 35 Elo | 2Z ▲ 0 Elo | 68.8 | 1763 |
| 16 A PEHARC SLO ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1840 | 1Z 1T ▲ 18 Elo | - ▼ 64 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 20 Elo | 2Z ▼ 5 Elo | 59.9 | 1815 |
| 17 N COLLIN BEL ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1664 | 1Z 1T ▲ 27 Elo | - ▼ 24 Elo | 3Z 4T ▼ 4 Elo | 2Z ▲ 7 Elo | 59.4 | 1673 |
| 18 R SUGIMOTO JPN ▼ 14 worse than predicted | 1770 | 1Z 1T ▲ 20 Elo | 2Z ▲ 0 Elo | 4Z ▼ 70 Elo | 3Z ▼ 4 Elo | 54.4 | 1716 |
| 19 S MCCOLL CAN ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1782 | 1Z 3T ▲ 3 Elo | 5Z ▼ 13 Elo | 7Z ▼ 74 Elo | 3Z ▼ 1 Elo | 53.6 | 1697 |
| 20 Y FLOHÉ GER ▼ 7 worse than predicted | 1726 | 2Z 3T ▲ 0 Elo | 7Z ▼ 11 Elo | 4Z ▼ 34 Elo | 4Z ▼ 5 Elo | 53.5 | 1676 |