Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
SM1
Z: (04) 2249 ■ T: (00) 2361 ■
SM2
Z: (17) 2012 ■ T: (09) 2169 ■
SM3
Z: (13) 1948 ■ T: (01) 2294 ■
SM4
Z: (20) 1775 ■ T: (02) 2297 ■
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | M1 2249 | M2 2012 | M3 2294 | M4 2297 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 K FUJII JPN ▬ | 1667 | 4Z ▲ 11 Elo | 7Z 7T ▲ 4 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 37 Elo | 2Z 4T ▲ 24 Elo | 82.3 | 1743 |
| 2 A ONDRA CZE ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1731 | - ▼ 16 Elo | 6Z 6T ▲ 3 Elo | 1Z ▲ 12 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 32 Elo | 59.0 | 1763 |
| 3 G VEZONIK SLO ▲ 13 better than predicted | 1690 | - ▼ 12 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 28 Elo | 2Z ▲ 10 Elo | 1Z ▲ 5 Elo | 44.7 | 1722 |
| 4 J SCHUBERT AUT ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1862 | - ▼ 27 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 5 Elo | 1Z ▲ 4 Elo | 2Z ▼ 14 Elo | 44.5 | 1832 |
| 5 A PEHARC SLO ▲ 6 better than predicted | 1815 | - ▼ 18 Elo | 4Z 4T ▲ 0 Elo | 2Z ▲ 3 Elo | 1Z ▲ 0 Elo | 44.3 | 1802 |
| 6 M SCHALCK FRA Top 10 ▲ 9 better than predicted | 1642 | - ▼ 12 Elo | 7Z 7T ▲ 14 Elo | 3Z ▲ 11 Elo | 3Z ▼ 3 Elo | 42.4 | 1653 |
| 7 M MAWEM FRA ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1763 | 1Z ▲ 15 Elo | 5Z ▼ 33 Elo | 1Z ▲ 12 Elo | 1Z ▲ 4 Elo | 39.6 | 1761 |
| 8 S LORENZI BEL ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1742 | - ▼ 13 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 16 Elo | - ▼ 25 Elo | 2Z ▼ 3 Elo | 34.5 | 1723 |
| 9 S BAILEY USA at home ▲ 8 better than predicted | 1683 | - ▼ 10 Elo | 5Z 5T ▲ 9 Elo | - ▼ 21 Elo | 2Z ▲ 3 Elo | 34.1 | 1668 |
| 10 A MEGOS GER ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1762 | - ▼ 14 Elo | 7Z 7T ▼ 17 Elo | - ▼ 33 Elo | 1Z ▲ 6 Elo | 33.5 | 1708 |
| 11 N UZNIK AUT ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1712 | 4Z ▲ 12 Elo | - ▼ 45 Elo | 2Z ▲ 10 Elo | 2Z ▲ 0 Elo | 29.5 | 1693 |
| 12 M PICCOLRUAZ ITA ▲ 6 better than predicted | 1775 | 4Z ▲ 9 Elo | 7Z ▼ 33 Elo | - ▼ 29 Elo | 1Z ▲ 6 Elo | 28.9 | 1733 |
| 13 A RUBTSOV RUS ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1736 | - ▼ 12 Elo | 7Z ▼ 20 Elo | 1Z ▲ 12 Elo | 1Z ▲ 7 Elo | 28.8 | 1724 |
| 13 S AMAGASA JPN ▼ 9 worse than predicted | 1607 | - ▼ 10 Elo | 5Z ▲ 3 Elo | 2Z ▲ 19 Elo | 7Z ▼ 32 Elo | 28.8 | 1588 |
| 15 C DUFFY USA at home ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1625 | - ▼ 11 Elo | 7Z ▼ 4 Elo | 2Z ▲ 19 Elo | 2Z ▲ 4 Elo | 28.8 | 1634 |
| 16 Y OGATA JPN ▼ 14 worse than predicted | 1692 | - ▼ 10 Elo | 7Z ▼ 11 Elo | 1Z ▲ 13 Elo | 7Z ▼ 32 Elo | 28.7 | 1653 |
| 17 R SUGIMOTO JPN ▼ 13 worse than predicted | 1839 | - ▼ 19 Elo | - ▼ 53 Elo | 4Z ▼ 12 Elo | 1Z ▲ 4 Elo | 19.7 | 1764 |
| 18 P MARTIN GER ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1673 | - ▼ 7 Elo | 5Z ▼ 1 Elo | - ▼ 24 Elo | 3Z ▼ 2 Elo | 19.4 | 1643 |
| 19 J HOJER GER ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 1774 | - ▼ 11 Elo | 6Z ▼ 16 Elo | - ▼ 41 Elo | 4Z ▼ 16 Elo | 19.2 | 1696 |
| 20 C SCHWEIGER GER ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1632 | - ▼ 6 Elo | - ▼ 20 Elo | - ▼ 14 Elo | 3Z ▲ 3 Elo | 9.8 | 1600 |