Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S1
Z: (20) 1792 ■ T: (15) 1960 ■
S3
Z: (10) 1963 ■ T: (06) 2028 ■
S2
Z: (02) 2185 ■ T: (02) 2169 ■
S4
Z: (06) 2051 ■ T: (04) 2076 ■
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1960 | 2 2169 | 3 1963 | 4 2051 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 A ONDRA CZE ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1887 | 4Z 4T ▼ 95 Elo | - ▼ 104 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 10 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 22 Elo | 74.3 | 1727 |
| 2 T TAKATA JPN ▲ 12 better than predicted | 1781 | 1Z 3T ▼ 19 Elo | - ▼ 79 Elo | 3Z ▼ 51 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 12 Elo | 59.4 | 1649 |
| 3 Y OGATA JPN ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1842 | 4Z ▼ 132 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 12 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 3 Elo | - ▼ 97 Elo | 59.1 | 1636 |
| 4 S AMAGASA JPN ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1595 | 3Z 5T ▼ 23 Elo | - ▼ 47 Elo | 5Z 5T ▼ 9 Elo | 3Z ▼ 20 Elo | 58.4 | 1499 |
| 5 N COLEMAN USA ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1914 | 1Z 2T ▼ 6 Elo | - ▼ 102 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 10 Elo | - ▼ 100 Elo | 49.7 | 1711 |
| 6 K FUJII JPN ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 1970 | 1Z 4T ▼ 36 Elo | - ▼ 95 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 2 Elo | - ▼ 109 Elo | 49.6 | 1745 |
| 7 A MEGOS GER ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1817 | 1Z 6T ▼ 25 Elo | - ▼ 44 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 1 Elo | - ▼ 73 Elo | 49.3 | 1684 |
| 8 J KRUDER SLO ▲ 8 better than predicted | 1821 | 5Z 6T ▼ 80 Elo | - ▼ 34 Elo | - ▼ 69 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 32 Elo | 49.1 | 1683 |
| 9 G VEZONIK SLO ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1784 | 6Z 6T ▼ 66 Elo | - ▼ 28 Elo | - ▼ 58 Elo | 4Z 4T ▲ 14 Elo | 48.4 | 1655 |
| 10 S BAILEY USA ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1732 | 1Z 3T ▲ 10 Elo | - ▼ 26 Elo | 2Z ▼ 21 Elo | - ▼ 47 Elo | 34.7 | 1653 |
| 11 M CORNU FRA ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1718 | 2Z 2T ▲ 11 Elo | - ▼ 31 Elo | 3Z ▼ 30 Elo | - ▼ 46 Elo | 34.6 | 1628 |
| 11 N UZNIK AUT ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1706 | 2Z 3T ▲ 3 Elo | - ▼ 25 Elo | 2Z ▼ 14 Elo | - ▼ 38 Elo | 34.6 | 1637 |
| 13 M SCHALCK FRA Top 10 ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1413 | 2Z 2T ▲ 48 Elo | - ▼ 11 Elo | - ▼ 40 Elo | 4Z ▲ 15 Elo | 34.5 | 1429 |
| 14 D SKOFIC SLO ▲ 6 better than predicted | 1589 | 7Z ▼ 39 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 39 Elo | - ▼ 53 Elo | - ▼ 27 Elo | 34.3 | 1516 |
| 15 Z L.SUDAR SLO ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1583 | 1Z 1T ▲ 29 Elo | - ▼ 14 Elo | - ▼ 40 Elo | - ▼ 21 Elo | 25.0 | 1544 |
| 16 R FULKERSON USA ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1615 | 1Z 2T ▲ 34 Elo | - ▼ 24 Elo | - ▼ 65 Elo | - ▼ 21 Elo | 24.9 | 1548 |
| 17 A RUBTSOV RUS ▼ 10 worse than predicted | 1835 | 2Z 7T ▼ 49 Elo | - ▼ 30 Elo | - ▼ 66 Elo | - ▼ 36 Elo | 24.2 | 1664 |
| 18 S LEHMANN SUI at home ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1710 | 4Z ▼ 54 Elo | - ▼ 14 Elo | - ▼ 32 Elo | - ▼ 18 Elo | 9.7 | 1597 |
| 19 N COLLIN BEL ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1687 | 7Z ▼ 49 Elo | - ▼ 11 Elo | - ▼ 21 Elo | - ▼ 18 Elo | 9.4 | 1591 |
| 19 Y FLOHÉ GER ▼ 10 worse than predicted | 1797 | 7Z ▼ 90 Elo | - ▼ 18 Elo | - ▼ 31 Elo | - ▼ 27 Elo | 9.4 | 1638 |