Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S2
Z: (18) 1717 ■ T: (02) 1979 ■
S3
Z: (12) 1848 ■ T: (02) 1989 ■
S4
Z: (03) 1956 ■ T: (02) 1980 ■
S1
Z: (11) 2037 ■ T: (01) 2033 ■
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 2033 | 2 1717 | 3 1989 | 4 1956 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 J GARNBRET SLO Top 10 ▬ | 2406 | 2Z 4T ▼ 38 Elo | 1Z ▼ 19 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 0 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 18 Elo | 84.4 | 2331 |
| 2 A NOGUCHI JPN at home ▬ | 2181 | 5Z ▼ 54 Elo | 1Z ▼ 16 Elo | 1Z 2T ▼ 7 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 3 Elo | 69.5 | 2107 |
| 3 I KAZBEKOVA UKR ▲ 6 better than predicted | 1810 | - ▼ 39 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 5 Elo | 2Z ▼ 25 Elo | - ▼ 32 Elo | 34.8 | 1739 |
| 4 N KURA JPN at home ▲ 12 better than predicted | 1772 | 4Z ▼ 38 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 17 Elo | - ▼ 44 Elo | - ▼ 29 Elo | 34.7 | 1700 |
| 5 M NONAKA JPN at home ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 2150 | 3Z ▼ 33 Elo | 1Z ▼ 17 Elo | - ▼ 60 Elo | 1Z ▼ 27 Elo | 29.8 | 2032 |
| 6 S COXSEY GBR ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1901 | 4Z ▼ 49 Elo | 1Z ▼ 19 Elo | 1Z ▼ 13 Elo | - ▼ 37 Elo | 29.7 | 1793 |
| 7 F ITO JPN at home ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 2066 | 4Z ▼ 67 Elo | 1Z ▼ 27 Elo | 2Z ▼ 39 Elo | - ▼ 47 Elo | 29.6 | 1898 |
| 7 A YIP CAN ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1914 | 4Z ▼ 41 Elo | 2Z ▼ 35 Elo | 1Z ▼ 12 Elo | - ▼ 34 Elo | 29.6 | 1801 |
| 9 F GIBERT FRA ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 2116 | 3Z ▼ 34 Elo | 2Z ▼ 49 Elo | 3Z ▼ 57 Elo | - ▼ 49 Elo | 29.5 | 1939 |
| 10 P KLINGLER SUI ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 2021 | 3Z ▼ 40 Elo | 1Z ▼ 24 Elo | 5Z ▼ 74 Elo | - ▼ 38 Elo | 29.4 | 1855 |
| 11 Y ZHANG CHN ▲ 6 better than predicted | 1811 | - ▼ 25 Elo | 2Z ▼ 26 Elo | 1Z ▼ 2 Elo | - ▼ 24 Elo | 19.9 | 1748 |
| 12 L RAKOVEC SLO ▼ 7 worse than predicted | 1846 | - ▼ 27 Elo | 1Z ▼ 12 Elo | 4Z ▼ 35 Elo | - ▼ 26 Elo | 19.7 | 1760 |
| 13 C SEO KOR ▲ 7 better than predicted | 1672 | - ▼ 19 Elo | 4Z ▼ 49 Elo | 4Z ▼ 8 Elo | - ▼ 17 Elo | 19.4 | 1589 |
| 14 K CONDIE USA ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1949 | 4Z ▼ 34 Elo | 7Z ▼ 103 Elo | - ▼ 33 Elo | - ▼ 25 Elo | 18.9 | 1771 |
| 15 A KOLLER SUI ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1649 | - ▼ 10 Elo | 1Z ▲ 5 Elo | - ▼ 18 Elo | - ▼ 13 Elo | 10.0 | 1626 |
| 15 U REPUSIC SLO ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1857 | - ▼ 24 Elo | 1Z ▼ 9 Elo | - ▼ 33 Elo | - ▼ 26 Elo | 10.0 | 1788 |
| 17 S YOKOYAMA SUI ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1594 | - ▼ 6 Elo | 2Z ▲ 1 Elo | - ▼ 12 Elo | - ▼ 8 Elo | 9.9 | 1576 |
| 17 M KRAMPL SLO ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1885 | - ▼ 27 Elo | 2Z ▼ 24 Elo | - ▼ 33 Elo | - ▼ 26 Elo | 9.9 | 1799 |
| 19 L ROGORA ITA ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1721 | - ▼ 13 Elo | - ▼ 30 Elo | 3Z ▼ 4 Elo | - ▼ 15 Elo | 9.8 | 1678 |
| 20 L DOUADY FRA ▼ 12 worse than predicted | 1965 | 6Z ▼ 58 Elo | - ▼ 67 Elo | - ▼ 50 Elo | - ▼ 37 Elo | 9.5 | 1800 |