Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S1
Z: (15) 2133 ■ T: (06) 2290 ■
S4
Z: (20) 1982 ■ T: (09) 2153 ■
S2
Z: (12) 2028 ■ T: (04) 2297 ■
S3
Z: (05) 2278 ■ T: (04) 2316 ■
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 2290 | 2 2297 | 3 2316 | 4 2153 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 J GARNBRET SLO Top 10 ▬ | 2173 | 4Z 4T ▼ 16 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 13 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 8 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 8 Elo | 99.2 | 2186 |
| 2 K DEBEVEC SLO ▲ 6 better than predicted | 1964 | 5Z 5T ▲ 2 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 32 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 23 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 10 Elo | 98.6 | 2031 |
| 3 A NOGUCHI JPN ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1978 | - ▼ 18 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 32 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 30 Elo | 2Z 3T ▲ 5 Elo | 74.6 | 2033 |
| 4 J PILZ AUT ▲ 1 better than predicted | 2045 | 4Z ▼ 15 Elo | 1Z ▲ 5 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 16 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 23 Elo | 69.3 | 2074 |
| 5 P KLINGLER SUI ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1966 | 3Z 7T ▲ 7 Elo | 1Z ▲ 7 Elo | - ▼ 12 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 26 Elo | 59.2 | 1997 |
| 6 F ITO JPN ▬ | 1960 | 7Z 7T ▼ 8 Elo | 1Z ▲ 8 Elo | - ▼ 11 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 13 Elo | 58.6 | 1965 |
| 7 F GIBERT FRA ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 2055 | - ▼ 22 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 26 Elo | - ▼ 18 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 2 Elo | 49.8 | 2055 |
| 8 A YIP CAN ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1843 | 6Z ▲ 2 Elo | 1Z ▲ 12 Elo | - ▼ 6 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 21 Elo | 44.3 | 1873 |
| 9 A SHIRAISHI USA ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1791 | 7Z ▲ 6 Elo | 1Z ▲ 20 Elo | - ▼ 8 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 24 Elo | 43.8 | 1835 |
| 10 C CAULIER BEL ▲ 4 better than predicted | 2007 | 7Z 7T ▼ 16 Elo | 1Z ▲ 3 Elo | - ▼ 12 Elo | 2Z ▼ 14 Elo | 43.3 | 1971 |
| 11 Y ZHANG CHN at home ▲ 8 better than predicted | 1894 | 6Z 6T ▲ 17 Elo | - ▼ 28 Elo | - ▼ 11 Elo | 3Z ▼ 14 Elo | 33.8 | 1871 |
| 12 L RAKOVEC SLO ▼ 8 worse than predicted | 2077 | 5Z ▼ 31 Elo | 2Z ▼ 14 Elo | - ▼ 21 Elo | 5Z ▼ 59 Elo | 29.1 | 1958 |
| 13 E REKABI IRI ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1821 | 7Z ▲ 3 Elo | - ▼ 13 Elo | 3Z ▲ 14 Elo | 7Z ▼ 16 Elo | 28.3 | 1814 |
| 14 J CHANOURDIE FRA ▼ 7 worse than predicted | 1763 | - ▼ 6 Elo | 1Z ▲ 15 Elo | - ▼ 4 Elo | 2Z ▲ 8 Elo | 19.9 | 1779 |
| 15 V LUKAN SLO ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1641 | 3Z ▲ 16 Elo | - ▼ 6 Elo | - ▼ 2 Elo | 1Z ▲ 15 Elo | 19.8 | 1667 |
| 16 M NAKAMURA JPN ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1897 | 6Z ▼ 4 Elo | - ▼ 18 Elo | - ▼ 6 Elo | 1Z ▲ 6 Elo | 19.5 | 1883 |
| 17 R JIANG CHN at home ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1654 | 6Z ▲ 13 Elo | - ▼ 7 Elo | - ▼ 2 Elo | 4Z ▲ 7 Elo | 19.2 | 1669 |
| 17 A JOHNSON USA ▼ 7 worse than predicted | 1771 | 4Z ▲ 10 Elo | - ▼ 10 Elo | - ▼ 4 Elo | 6Z ▼ 10 Elo | 19.2 | 1762 |
| 19 M HAYES USA ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1734 | - ▼ 6 Elo | - ▼ 7 Elo | - ▼ 3 Elo | 4Z ▲ 2 Elo | 9.7 | 1726 |
| 20 J KIM KOR ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1805 | - ▼ 8 Elo | - ▼ 11 Elo | - ▼ 4 Elo | 7Z ▼ 16 Elo | 9.1 | 1774 |