Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S2
Z: (04) 2260 ■ T: (01) 2351 ■
S3
Z: (05) 2186 ■ T: (02) 2309 ■
S1
Z: (15) 1975 ■ T: (04) 2254 ■
S4
Z: (14) 1992 ■ T: (00) 2377 ■
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 2254 | 2 2351 | 3 2309 | 4 2377 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 S COXSEY GBR ▲ 10 better than predicted | 1941 | 3Z 3T ▲ 13 Elo | - ▼ 10 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 29 Elo | 2Z ▲ 1 Elo | 59.3 | 1977 |
| 2 J GARNBRET SLO Top 10 ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 2143 | 6Z 6T ▼ 33 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 10 Elo | - ▼ 11 Elo | 1Z ▲ 0 Elo | 58.8 | 2112 |
| 3 F GIBERT FRA ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1984 | 1Z ▲ 5 Elo | 5Z ▼ 1 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 20 Elo | 1Z ▲ 6 Elo | 54.2 | 2014 |
| 4 J PILZ AUT ▬ | 1990 | 2Z 2T ▲ 18 Elo | - ▼ 13 Elo | - ▼ 15 Elo | 1Z ▲ 7 Elo | 34.8 | 1995 |
| 5 L RAKOVEC SLO ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1705 | 3Z 4T ▲ 45 Elo | - ▼ 5 Elo | - ▼ 5 Elo | 2Z ▲ 18 Elo | 34.4 | 1760 |
| 6 F ITO JPN ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1846 | 2Z ▲ 6 Elo | 1Z ▲ 16 Elo | - ▼ 9 Elo | 3Z ▲ 1 Elo | 29.7 | 1863 |
| 7 S SA KOR ▲ 7 better than predicted | 1895 | 3Z ▼ 4 Elo | 5Z ▲ 6 Elo | - ▼ 8 Elo | 2Z ▲ 3 Elo | 29.3 | 1894 |
| 8 P KLINGLER SUI ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1838 | 1Z ▲ 11 Elo | - ▼ 6 Elo | - ▼ 7 Elo | 2Z ▲ 6 Elo | 19.9 | 1846 |
| 9 A YIP CAN ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1792 | 1Z ▲ 12 Elo | - ▼ 5 Elo | - ▼ 4 Elo | 3Z ▲ 4 Elo | 19.8 | 1801 |
| 10 I KAZBEKOVA UKR ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1713 | 4Z ▲ 5 Elo | - ▼ 4 Elo | 2Z ▲ 17 Elo | - ▼ 9 Elo | 19.6 | 1727 |
| 10 E PHILLIPS GBR ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1853 | 4Z ▼ 11 Elo | - ▼ 9 Elo | - ▼ 10 Elo | 2Z ▲ 10 Elo | 19.6 | 1839 |
| 12 S LETTNER AUT ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1817 | 6Z ▼ 17 Elo | - ▼ 6 Elo | - ▼ 8 Elo | 3Z ▲ 5 Elo | 19.3 | 1795 |
| 13 Y ZHANG CHN ▲ 6 better than predicted | 1779 | - ▼ 17 Elo | - ▼ 6 Elo | 6Z ▲ 16 Elo | 5Z ▼ 7 Elo | 19.1 | 1774 |
| 14 A HÖNIG GER ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1731 | 1Z ▲ 14 Elo | - ▼ 3 Elo | - ▼ 5 Elo | - ▼ 10 Elo | 10.0 | 1735 |
| 14 I KUZMENKO RUS at home ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1765 | 1Z ▲ 20 Elo | - ▼ 6 Elo | - ▼ 8 Elo | - ▼ 16 Elo | 10.0 | 1766 |
| 16 K CONDIE USA ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1796 | 2Z ▲ 6 Elo | - ▼ 5 Elo | - ▼ 5 Elo | - ▼ 11 Elo | 9.9 | 1789 |
| 17 N GROSSMAN USA ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 1758 | - ▼ 17 Elo | - ▼ 5 Elo | 3Z ▲ 22 Elo | - ▼ 14 Elo | 9.8 | 1758 |
| 17 J FÄRBER AUT ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1833 | - ▼ 18 Elo | - ▼ 5 Elo | - ▼ 6 Elo | 3Z ▲ 2 Elo | 9.8 | 1817 |
| 19 K DEBEVEC SLO ▼ 13 worse than predicted | 1847 | - ▼ 17 Elo | - ▼ 4 Elo | - ▼ 7 Elo | 4Z ▼ 3 Elo | 9.7 | 1826 |
| 20 B SCHWAIGER AUT ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1762 | - ▼ 11 Elo | - ▼ 3 Elo | - ▼ 4 Elo | - ▼ 9 Elo | 0.0 | 1745 |