Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S2
Z: (20) 1411 ■ T: (13) 1779 ■
S4
Z: (15) 1675 ■ T: (07) 1832 ■
S1
Z: (18) 1718 ■ T: (15) 1778 ■
S3
Z: (14) 1759 ■ T: (03) 1935 ■
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1718 | 2 1779 | 3 1935 | 4 1675 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 J GARNBRET SLO Top 10 ▬ | 2145 | 1Z 1T ▲ 0 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 1 Elo | 1Z 2T ▼ 7 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 1 Elo | 99.9 | 2140 |
| 1 A NOGUCHI JPN ▬ | 2102 | 1Z 1T ▲ 1 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 1 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 2 Elo | 1Z 2T ▼ 7 Elo | 99.9 | 2099 |
| 3 F GIBERT FRA ▬ | 2104 | 1Z 1T ▲ 1 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 0 Elo | 3Z ▼ 60 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 4 Elo | 84.8 | 2049 |
| 3 P KLINGLER SUI at home ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1803 | 2Z 2T ▼ 25 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 8 Elo | 1Z ▼ 13 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 12 Elo | 84.8 | 1785 |
| 5 S COXSEY GBR ▲ 8 better than predicted | 1937 | 2Z 2T ▼ 32 Elo | 1Z 2T ▼ 13 Elo | 1Z ▼ 20 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 8 Elo | 84.7 | 1880 |
| 6 O MACKENZIE AUS Top 10 ▲ 11 better than predicted | 1751 | 1Z 1T ▲ 14 Elo | 1Z 3T ▼ 26 Elo | - ▼ 59 Elo | 2Z 3T ▼ 21 Elo | 74.5 | 1678 |
| 7 F ITO JPN ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1875 | 1Z 1T ▲ 7 Elo | 1Z 4T ▼ 41 Elo | 2Z ▼ 27 Elo | 1Z ▼ 20 Elo | 69.6 | 1794 |
| 8 A JOHNSON USA ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1741 | 3Z ▼ 75 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 19 Elo | 3Z 3T ▼ 10 Elo | 1Z ▼ 17 Elo | 69.4 | 1658 |
| 9 K CONDIE USA ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1717 | 2Z 3T ▼ 25 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 12 Elo | 3Z ▼ 25 Elo | 3Z ▼ 35 Elo | 69.3 | 1644 |
| 10 A HÖNIG GER ▬ | 1651 | 2Z 2T ▼ 5 Elo | 1Z ▼ 15 Elo | - ▼ 24 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 21 Elo | 59.8 | 1636 |
| 11 S LETTNER AUT ▲ 7 better than predicted | 1614 | 2Z 2T ▲ 0 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 2 Elo | 2Z ▼ 5 Elo | - ▼ 51 Elo | 59.5 | 1576 |
| 12 K DEBEVEC SLO ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 1860 | 4Z 5T ▼ 92 Elo | 1Z 3T ▼ 13 Elo | 1Z ▼ 6 Elo | - ▼ 47 Elo | 59.1 | 1716 |
| 13 A YIP CAN ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1843 | 2Z 2T ▼ 15 Elo | 1Z ▼ 24 Elo | 3Z ▼ 31 Elo | 4Z ▼ 50 Elo | 54.3 | 1723 |
| 14 I KAZBEKOVA UKR ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1691 | 3Z 3T ▼ 22 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 6 Elo | - ▼ 28 Elo | - ▼ 38 Elo | 49.5 | 1630 |
| 15 B SCHWAIGER AUT ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1781 | 3Z 4T ▼ 44 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 1 Elo | - ▼ 34 Elo | - ▼ 41 Elo | 49.4 | 1686 |
| 16 L RAKOVEC SLO ▼ 12 worse than predicted | 1560 | 4Z 4T ▼ 5 Elo | 1Z ▼ 9 Elo | - ▼ 23 Elo | 3Z ▼ 8 Elo | 44.2 | 1523 |
| 17 J CHANOURDIE FRA ▼ 11 worse than predicted | 1672 | 1Z ▼ 6 Elo | 1Z ▼ 13 Elo | - ▼ 23 Elo | 3Z ▼ 18 Elo | 29.8 | 1620 |
| 17 S SA KOR ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1962 | - ▼ 63 Elo | 1Z ▼ 28 Elo | 3Z ▼ 37 Elo | 1Z ▼ 17 Elo | 29.8 | 1833 |
| 19 J PINGGERA AUT ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1759 | - ▼ 42 Elo | 3Z ▼ 48 Elo | 2Z ▼ 3 Elo | 2Z ▼ 12 Elo | 29.6 | 1665 |
| 20 E PHILLIPS GBR ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1682 | 3Z ▼ 30 Elo | 1Z ▼ 13 Elo | 4Z ▼ 16 Elo | - ▼ 40 Elo | 29.5 | 1596 |