Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S1
Z: (18) 1735 ■ T: (12) 1853 ■
S2
Z: (17) 1966 ■ T: (16) 1929 ■
S3
Z: (16) 1781 ■ T: (03) 1959 ■
S4
Z: (15) 1878 ■ T: (04) 1954 ■
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1853 | 2 1929 | 3 1781 | 4 1954 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 A ONDRA CZE ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1660 | 2Z 2T ▼ 10 Elo | 3Z 3T ▼ 36 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 17 Elo | 3Z 3T ▼ 12 Elo | 98.9 | 1619 |
| 2 T NARASAKI JPN Top 10 ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 2111 | 1Z 1T ▲ 1 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 1 Elo | 1Z ▼ 17 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 3 Elo | 85.0 | 2099 |
| 3 R SUGIMOTO JPN ▲ 12 better than predicted | 2038 | 2Z 2T ▼ 34 Elo | 5Z 5T ▼ 135 Elo | 2Z ▼ 38 Elo | 3Z 5T ▼ 57 Elo | 83.3 | 1774 |
| 4 Y OGATA JPN ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 2010 | 4Z 4T ▼ 93 Elo | 1Z 2T ▼ 4 Elo | 1Z ▼ 20 Elo | 1Z ▼ 17 Elo | 69.3 | 1876 |
| 5 K FUJII JPN ▲ 5 better than predicted | 2054 | 6Z ▼ 125 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 6 Elo | 2Z ▼ 41 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 18 Elo | 69.2 | 1876 |
| 5 T TAKATA JPN ▲ 8 better than predicted | 1926 | 1Z 1T ▲ 7 Elo | 3Z 4T ▼ 71 Elo | 1Z ▼ 18 Elo | 4Z ▼ 55 Elo | 69.2 | 1789 |
| 7 J CHON KOR ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1915 | 1Z ▼ 29 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 24 Elo | 3Z 3T ▼ 39 Elo | 3Z ▼ 43 Elo | 69.2 | 1780 |
| 8 T ISHIMATSU JPN ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1858 | 1Z 2T ▼ 2 Elo | 4Z 5T ▼ 64 Elo | 2Z ▼ 25 Elo | 2Z ▼ 15 Elo | 69.0 | 1752 |
| 8 A RUBTSOV RUS ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1948 | 1Z 1T ▲ 6 Elo | 4Z 4T ▼ 81 Elo | 1Z ▼ 18 Elo | 5Z ▼ 63 Elo | 69.0 | 1792 |
| 10 K DOHI JPN ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1850 | 2Z 2T ▼ 14 Elo | 6Z 6T ▼ 75 Elo | 3Z ▼ 33 Elo | 3Z ▼ 19 Elo | 68.4 | 1709 |
| 11 J KRUDER SLO ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 2112 | 1Z 3T ▼ 14 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 25 Elo | - ▼ 65 Elo | 5Z ▼ 81 Elo | 59.2 | 1945 |
| 12 A KHAZANOV ISR ▲ 7 better than predicted | 1871 | 3Z ▼ 47 Elo | 5Z 5T ▼ 41 Elo | 5Z ▼ 48 Elo | 5Z ▼ 23 Elo | 53.2 | 1712 |
| 13 T REUSER NED ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1635 | 1Z 3T ▲ 18 Elo | 4Z 4T ▲ 3 Elo | - ▼ 40 Elo | - ▼ 25 Elo | 49.2 | 1612 |
| 14 Y PAN CHN ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1682 | 3Z 4T ▼ 18 Elo | 5Z 7T ▼ 17 Elo | - ▼ 26 Elo | - ▼ 15 Elo | 48.4 | 1619 |
| 15 A PEHARC SLO ▼ 8 worse than predicted | 1864 | 1Z ▼ 18 Elo | - ▼ 36 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 13 Elo | 2Z ▼ 14 Elo | 44.8 | 1818 |
| 16 A MEGOS GER ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1762 | 1Z 2T ▲ 10 Elo | - ▼ 27 Elo | 2Z ▼ 12 Elo | - ▼ 25 Elo | 34.8 | 1722 |
| 17 N COLEMAN USA ▼ 9 worse than predicted | 1885 | - ▼ 53 Elo | 3Z 3T ▼ 9 Elo | 2Z ▼ 20 Elo | - ▼ 30 Elo | 34.5 | 1795 |
| 18 S GHISOLFI ITA ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1711 | - ▼ 49 Elo | 6Z 6T ▼ 8 Elo | - ▼ 34 Elo | 4Z ▼ 4 Elo | 33.7 | 1642 |
| 19 N PHILLIPS GBR ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1898 | 1Z ▼ 19 Elo | - ▼ 36 Elo | 4Z ▼ 41 Elo | 3Z ▼ 17 Elo | 29.5 | 1794 |
| 20 G VEZONIK SLO ▼ 9 worse than predicted | 2011 | 2Z ▼ 41 Elo | 7Z ▼ 68 Elo | 2Z ▼ 23 Elo | - ▼ 35 Elo | 29.2 | 1853 |