Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S3
Z: (07) 2260 ■ T: (03) 2339 ■
S2
Z: (13) 2104 ■ T: (02) 2365 ■
S4
Z: (14) 2113 ■ T: (08) 2210 ■
S1
Z: (13) 2060 ■ T: (04) 2303 ■
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 2303 | 2 2365 | 3 2339 | 4 2113 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 S SA KOR ▲ 9 better than predicted | 1963 | 3Z 4T ▲ 16 Elo | 2Z 3T ▲ 22 Elo | 4Z 4T ▲ 16 Elo | 6Z ▼ 25 Elo | 83.1 | 1992 |
| 2 A NOGUCHI JPN ▲ 2 better than predicted | 2096 | 1Z 1T ▲ 19 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 11 Elo | 7Z ▼ 16 Elo | 7Z 7T ▼ 38 Elo | 83.0 | 2072 |
| 3 M NONAKA JPN ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 2092 | 1Z 1T ▲ 18 Elo | 1Z ▲ 1 Elo | 4Z ▼ 6 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 13 Elo | 69.7 | 2118 |
| 4 K SAURWEIN AUT ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1857 | 2Z 2T ▲ 29 Elo | 2Z ▲ 9 Elo | 4Z ▲ 9 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 28 Elo | 69.2 | 1932 |
| 5 M RETSCHY GER ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1922 | 2Z ▲ 4 Elo | 3Z ▲ 1 Elo | 5Z 5T ▲ 19 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 25 Elo | 68.7 | 1971 |
| 6 M L.NEVE FRA ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 2117 | 2Z ▼ 7 Elo | 1Z ▲ 0 Elo | - ▼ 10 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 12 Elo | 44.9 | 2115 |
| 7 C KAISER FRA ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1900 | 1Z ▲ 10 Elo | - ▼ 13 Elo | 3Z ▲ 9 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 25 Elo | 44.6 | 1936 |
| 8 F GIBERT FRA ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1951 | 4Z ▼ 10 Elo | 5Z ▼ 10 Elo | - ▼ 10 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 15 Elo | 43.9 | 1939 |
| 9 H LEE TPE ▲ 7 better than predicted | 1793 | 4Z ▲ 5 Elo | 5Z ▲ 5 Elo | - ▼ 5 Elo | 7Z 7T ▲ 8 Elo | 43.1 | 1808 |
| 10 S COXSEY GBR ▼ 9 worse than predicted | 2152 | - ▼ 18 Elo | 3Z ▼ 11 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 3 Elo | - ▼ 19 Elo | 34.4 | 2118 |
| 11 L CRANE GBR ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1939 | - ▼ 18 Elo | 2Z ▲ 6 Elo | - ▼ 10 Elo | 3Z ▼ 2 Elo | 19.7 | 1925 |
| 12 B SCHWAIGER AUT ▬ | 1903 | - ▼ 15 Elo | 4Z ▼ 1 Elo | - ▼ 7 Elo | 2Z ▲ 5 Elo | 19.6 | 1892 |
| 13 K SINNHUBER AUT ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1903 | 3Z ▲ 1 Elo | - ▼ 12 Elo | - ▼ 8 Elo | 6Z ▼ 12 Elo | 19.3 | 1878 |
| 14 M KOTAKE JPN ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1898 | - ▼ 14 Elo | 4Z ▲ 0 Elo | - ▼ 7 Elo | 7Z ▼ 14 Elo | 19.1 | 1870 |
| 15 J PINGGERA AUT ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1656 | 3Z ▲ 14 Elo | - ▼ 4 Elo | - ▼ 2 Elo | 7Z ▲ 8 Elo | 19.0 | 1674 |
| 16 A ONOE JPN ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1915 | - ▼ 16 Elo | 3Z ▲ 3 Elo | - ▼ 8 Elo | - ▼ 16 Elo | 9.8 | 1891 |
| 16 E SETHNA CAN ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1593 | 3Z ▲ 15 Elo | - ▼ 2 Elo | - ▼ 1 Elo | - ▼ 5 Elo | 9.8 | 1603 |
| 18 L CHULICH USA ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1690 | 7Z ▲ 4 Elo | - ▼ 5 Elo | - ▼ 2 Elo | - ▼ 6 Elo | 9.3 | 1686 |
| 19 A SAKAMOTO JPN ▼ 8 worse than predicted | 1803 | - ▼ 14 Elo | - ▼ 12 Elo | - ▼ 6 Elo | - ▼ 13 Elo | 0.0 | 1774 |
| 19 A YIP CAN ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1874 | - ▼ 21 Elo | - ▼ 15 Elo | - ▼ 8 Elo | - ▼ 17 Elo | 0.0 | 1834 |
