Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S1
Z: (20) 1737 ■ T: (13) 1994 ■
S2
Z: (18) 1795 ■ T: (01) 2337 ■
S3
Z: (19) 1861 ■ T: (07) 2149 ■
S4
Z: (13) 2013 ■ T: (02) 2310 ■
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1994 | 2 2337 | 3 1861 | 4 2310 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 S COXSEY GBR ▬ | 2085 | 1Z 1T ▲ 16 Elo | 1Z ▼ 1 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 9 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 12 Elo | 85.0 | 2121 |
| 2 A NOGUCHI JPN ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1940 | 1Z 2T ▲ 17 Elo | 1Z ▲ 6 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 25 Elo | 2Z ▼ 1 Elo | 69.8 | 1987 |
| 3 M NONAKA JPN ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 2012 | 1Z 1T ▲ 19 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 22 Elo | 3Z ▼ 29 Elo | 3Z ▼ 12 Elo | 69.5 | 2012 |
| 3 K SINNHUBER AUT ▲ 14 better than predicted | 1735 | 1Z 1T ▲ 32 Elo | 1Z ▲ 13 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 29 Elo | 4Z ▲ 4 Elo | 69.5 | 1813 |
| 5 M RETSCHY GER ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1906 | 1Z 2T ▲ 16 Elo | 1Z ▲ 6 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 22 Elo | - ▼ 18 Elo | 59.8 | 1939 |
| 6 M L.NEVE FRA ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 2025 | 1Z 1T ▲ 15 Elo | 1Z ▲ 0 Elo | 1Z ▼ 8 Elo | 2Z ▼ 4 Elo | 54.9 | 2028 |
| 6 M TRACY GBR ▲ 6 better than predicted | 1893 | 1Z 2T ▲ 12 Elo | 1Z ▲ 7 Elo | 1Z ▲ 1 Elo | 1Z ▲ 11 Elo | 54.9 | 1924 |
| 8 P KLINGLER SUI ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1992 | 2Z ▼ 31 Elo | 2Z ▼ 8 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 12 Elo | 2Z ▲ 2 Elo | 54.5 | 1967 |
| 9 B SCHWAIGER AUT ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1823 | 2Z 4T ▼ 3 Elo | 1Z ▲ 9 Elo | 2Z ▼ 1 Elo | 2Z ▲ 9 Elo | 54.4 | 1837 |
| 10 A ONOE JPN ▲ 6 better than predicted | 1870 | 2Z 3T ▼ 4 Elo | 1Z ▲ 8 Elo | 6Z ▼ 40 Elo | 3Z ▲ 6 Elo | 54.0 | 1840 |
| 11 M KOTAKE JPN ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1712 | 1Z 3T ▲ 25 Elo | - ▼ 11 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 33 Elo | - ▼ 6 Elo | 49.8 | 1760 |
| 12 C CAULIER BEL ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1793 | 1Z 1T ▲ 27 Elo | 1Z ▲ 10 Elo | 1Z ▲ 6 Elo | - ▼ 10 Elo | 45.0 | 1830 |
| 13 C KAISER FRA ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1721 | 1Z ▲ 4 Elo | 1Z ▲ 13 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 25 Elo | - ▼ 6 Elo | 44.8 | 1759 |
| 14 F GIBERT FRA ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1862 | 1Z 1T ▲ 23 Elo | 2Z ▼ 2 Elo | 4Z ▼ 22 Elo | - ▼ 11 Elo | 44.6 | 1854 |
| 15 S SA KOR ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1884 | 1Z ▼ 7 Elo | 1Z ▲ 6 Elo | - ▼ 26 Elo | 5Z 5T ▲ 10 Elo | 44.2 | 1876 |
| 16 L CRANE GBR ▼ 10 worse than predicted | 1880 | 1Z ▼ 7 Elo | 1Z ▲ 6 Elo | 1Z ▲ 3 Elo | 1Z ▲ 11 Elo | 40.0 | 1893 |
| 17 K SAURWEIN AUT ▼ 7 worse than predicted | 1730 | 1Z ▲ 4 Elo | 2Z ▲ 5 Elo | 1Z ▲ 10 Elo | 5Z ▲ 3 Elo | 39.5 | 1752 |
| 18 Y KOBAYASHI JPN ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1623 | 1Z ▲ 10 Elo | 2Z ▲ 9 Elo | 4Z ▲ 3 Elo | 5Z ▲ 9 Elo | 39.2 | 1654 |
| 19 S BLAIR-COYL. USA ▬ | 1749 | 1Z 2T ▲ 22 Elo | - ▼ 15 Elo | 1Z ▲ 8 Elo | - ▼ 7 Elo | 34.9 | 1767 |
| 20 H LEE TPE ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1603 | 1Z ▲ 10 Elo | 1Z ▲ 14 Elo | 3Z ▲ 7 Elo | - ▼ 5 Elo | 29.8 | 1631 |