Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S1
Z: (03) 1958 ■ T: (02) 1971 ■
S2
Z: (05) 1994 ■ T: (04) 1967 ■
S4
Z: (10) 1813 ■ T: (04) 1887 ■
S3
Z: (17) 1609 ■ T: (14) 1667 ■
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1958 | 2 1967 | 3 1609 | 4 1813 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 J GARNBRET SLO Top 10 ▲ 9 better than predicted | 1614 | 4Z 4T ▲ 4 Elo | 5Z 5T ▼ 18 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 24 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 36 Elo | 98.6 | 1660 |
| 2 C KAISER FRA ▲ 9 better than predicted | 1438 | - ▼ 13 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 52 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 33 Elo | 1Z ▲ 6 Elo | 60.0 | 1519 |
| 2 M L.NEVE FRA ▬ | 1876 | 1Z 1T ▲ 16 Elo | - ▼ 54 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 5 Elo | 1Z ▼ 22 Elo | 60.0 | 1834 |
| 4 F GIBERT FRA ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1940 | 2Z ▼ 29 Elo | 7Z 7T ▼ 100 Elo | 1Z 2T ▼ 11 Elo | - ▼ 49 Elo | 58.2 | 1765 |
| 5 A NOGUCHI JPN ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 2065 | - ▼ 63 Elo | - ▼ 63 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 3 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 6 Elo | 50.0 | 1980 |
| 5 M MASCARENAS USA ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 2046 | - ▼ 64 Elo | - ▼ 62 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 3 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 8 Elo | 50.0 | 1962 |
| 7 S COXSEY GBR ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1981 | - ▼ 55 Elo | - ▼ 53 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 3 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 20 Elo | 49.8 | 1883 |
| 8 C CAULIER BEL ▲ 7 better than predicted | 1753 | - ▼ 21 Elo | 6Z 6T ▼ 8 Elo | 2Z ▼ 40 Elo | 5Z ▼ 25 Elo | 43.5 | 1665 |
| 9 M TRACY GBR ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1824 | - ▼ 34 Elo | - ▼ 31 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 7 Elo | 2Z ▼ 27 Elo | 34.9 | 1756 |
| 10 S GEJO SRB ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1822 | - ▼ 48 Elo | - ▼ 41 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 11 Elo | 4Z ▼ 64 Elo | 34.7 | 1702 |
| 11 P KLINGLER SUI at home ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1922 | - ▼ 42 Elo | 7Z ▼ 54 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 5 Elo | - ▼ 49 Elo | 34.1 | 1806 |
| 12 J PILZ AUT ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1624 | - ▼ 19 Elo | - ▼ 16 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 20 Elo | - ▼ 33 Elo | 25.0 | 1594 |
| 12 L CRANE GBR ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 1766 | - ▼ 25 Elo | - ▼ 20 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 8 Elo | - ▼ 35 Elo | 25.0 | 1714 |
| 14 S SA KOR ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1851 | - ▼ 31 Elo | - ▼ 27 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 28 Elo | - ▼ 37 Elo | 24.8 | 1752 |
| 15 M NONAKA JPN ▼ 13 worse than predicted | 1896 | - ▼ 35 Elo | - ▼ 30 Elo | 1Z 4T ▼ 45 Elo | - ▼ 39 Elo | 24.7 | 1774 |
| 16 K SAURWEIN AUT ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1732 | - ▼ 19 Elo | - ▼ 16 Elo | 4Z ▼ 62 Elo | 4Z ▼ 12 Elo | 19.4 | 1632 |
| 17 A YIP CAN ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1573 | - ▼ 12 Elo | - ▼ 10 Elo | 4Z ▼ 50 Elo | - ▼ 17 Elo | 9.7 | 1494 |
| 18 V ZIJLSTRA NED ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1625 | - ▼ 10 Elo | - ▼ 9 Elo | - ▼ 37 Elo | - ▼ 14 Elo | 0.0 | 1574 |
| 18 M HAYES USA ▬ | 1681 | - ▼ 20 Elo | - ▼ 17 Elo | - ▼ 64 Elo | - ▼ 24 Elo | 0.0 | 1589 |
| 18 A DUFRAISSE FRA ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1605 | - ▼ 15 Elo | - ▼ 12 Elo | - ▼ 55 Elo | - ▼ 18 Elo | 0.0 | 1531 |
