Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S1
Z: (21) 1512 ■ T: (17) 1648 ■
S2
Z: (20) 1814 ■ T: (18) 1891 ■
S3
Z: (21) 1458 ■ T: (20) 1491 ■
S4
Z: (21) 1545 ■ T: (14) 1741 ■
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1648 | 2 1891 | 3 1491 | 4 1741 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 J HOJER GER ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1933 | 1Z 1T ▲ 3 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 3 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 2 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 4 Elo | 100.0 | 1945 |
| 2 J CHON KOR ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1768 | 1Z 1T ▲ 7 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 26 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 6 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 21 Elo | 99.6 | 1734 |
| 3 A MECHERZYNS. POL ▲ 9 better than predicted | 1723 | 1Z 1T ▲ 8 Elo | 3Z 3T ▼ 49 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 9 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 11 Elo | 99.6 | 1702 |
| 4 J BONDER FRA ▲ 12 better than predicted | 1785 | 1Z 1T ▲ 5 Elo | 4Z 4T ▼ 78 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 7 Elo | 1Z 3T ▼ 16 Elo | 99.2 | 1703 |
| 4 S MCCOLL CAN ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1899 | 1Z 1T ▲ 3 Elo | 4Z 4T ▼ 88 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 4 Elo | 1Z 3T ▼ 22 Elo | 99.2 | 1796 |
| 4 D SHARAFUTDI. RUS ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1936 | 1Z 1T ▲ 3 Elo | 1Z 6T ▼ 41 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 3 Elo | 2Z 3T ▼ 45 Elo | 99.2 | 1856 |
| 7 A ONDRA CZE ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1828 | 1Z 1T ▲ 7 Elo | 4Z 7T ▼ 93 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 9 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 14 Elo | 99.1 | 1765 |
| 8 T HORI JPN ▲ 12 better than predicted | 1791 | 1Z 1T ▲ 5 Elo | 6Z 6T ▼ 82 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 7 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 11 Elo | 99.0 | 1732 |
| 8 R GELMANOV RUS ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 1864 | 1Z 1T ▲ 4 Elo | 6Z 6T ▼ 119 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 5 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 10 Elo | 99.0 | 1764 |
| 10 R SUGIMOTO JPN ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1814 | 2Z 2T ▼ 29 Elo | 3Z 3T ▼ 11 Elo | 4Z 4T ▼ 91 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 12 Elo | 98.8 | 1695 |
| 11 K FUJII JPN ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1856 | 1Z 1T ▲ 4 Elo | 5Z 5T ▼ 47 Elo | 3Z 3T ▼ 60 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 18 Elo | 98.6 | 1735 |
| 12 G BARATZADEH IRI ▲ 6 better than predicted | 1744 | 2Z 2T ▼ 24 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 28 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 8 Elo | 1Z ▼ 23 Elo | 84.8 | 1733 |
| 13 A LEVIER FRA ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1783 | 1Z 1T ▲ 7 Elo | 4Z 4T ▼ 15 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 7 Elo | 1Z ▼ 24 Elo | 84.4 | 1758 |
| 14 T NARASAKI JPN Top 10 ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1699 | 2Z 2T ▼ 19 Elo | 2Z 2T ▲ 21 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 18 Elo | 2Z ▼ 30 Elo | 84.3 | 1653 |
| 15 M PICCOLRUAZ ITA ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 1738 | 1Z 1T ▲ 8 Elo | 1Z 5T ▲ 5 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 8 Elo | 4Z ▼ 65 Elo | 84.3 | 1694 |
| 16 J KASSAY AUS ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1733 | 2Z 2T ▼ 22 Elo | 7Z ▼ 30 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 11 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 2 Elo | 83.8 | 1694 |
| 17 A DIFELICE CAN ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1641 | 3Z 3T ▼ 50 Elo | - ▼ 20 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 24 Elo | 1Z 3T ▲ 11 Elo | 74.4 | 1612 |
| 18 N COLEMAN USA ▼ 12 worse than predicted | 1893 | 2Z ▼ 73 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 23 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 7 Elo | 1Z ▼ 37 Elo | 69.8 | 1813 |
| 19 M CORNU FRA ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1665 | 1Z ▼ 25 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 23 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 15 Elo | 3Z ▼ 56 Elo | 69.4 | 1622 |
| 20 M NAKANO JPN ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1566 | 1Z ▼ 14 Elo | 7Z ▼ 8 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 25 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 25 Elo | 69.1 | 1594 |
| 21 T FARRELL AUS ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1849 | 1Z ▼ 28 Elo | 2Z 3T ▼ 3 Elo | 1Z ▼ 32 Elo | 2Z ▼ 34 Elo | 54.6 | 1752 |