Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S3
Z: (20) 1831 ■ T: (08) 1944 ■
S4
Z: (11) 1920 ■ T: (05) 1967 ■
S1
Z: (16) 1793 ■ T: (01) 2030 ■
S2
Z: (19) 1455 ■ T: (08) 1896 ■
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1793 | 2 1896 | 3 1831 | 4 1967 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 A PUCCIO USA ▲ 12 better than predicted | 1997 | 1Z ▼ 27 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 4 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 4 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 7 Elo | 85.0 | 1985 |
| 2 J WURM GER ▲ 12 better than predicted | 2048 | 1Z ▼ 29 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 3 Elo | 1Z 2T ▼ 14 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 27 Elo | 84.7 | 1981 |
| 3 A NOGUCHI JPN ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 2218 | 1Z ▼ 18 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 1 Elo | 3Z 4T ▼ 47 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 2 Elo | 84.5 | 2156 |
| 4 K SAURWEIN AUT ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1892 | - ▼ 54 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 7 Elo | 2Z 4T ▼ 43 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 13 Elo | 74.6 | 1832 |
| 5 A STÖHR AUT ▲ 3 better than predicted | 2106 | - ▼ 58 Elo | 1Z 3T ▼ 33 Elo | 1Z 2T ▼ 11 Elo | 7Z 7T ▼ 162 Elo | 73.5 | 1861 |
| 6 M L.NEVE FRA ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1969 | 2Z ▼ 38 Elo | 1Z 2T ▼ 9 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 23 Elo | 2Z ▼ 30 Elo | 69.5 | 1869 |
| 7 M NONAKA JPN ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 2102 | 1Z ▼ 21 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 3 Elo | 3Z 3T ▼ 64 Elo | - ▼ 60 Elo | 59.6 | 1976 |
| 8 F GIBERT FRA ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1996 | 3Z ▼ 55 Elo | 1Z ▼ 29 Elo | 1Z 2T ▼ 2 Elo | 3Z ▼ 39 Elo | 54.5 | 1871 |
| 9 S COXSEY GBR ▼ 7 worse than predicted | 2097 | 1Z ▼ 27 Elo | 1Z 2T ▼ 13 Elo | 6Z ▼ 116 Elo | 2Z ▼ 29 Elo | 54.3 | 1912 |
| 9 J KRUDER SLO ▬ | 1755 | 3Z 4T ▼ 15 Elo | 1Z ▼ 15 Elo | 1Z ▼ 5 Elo | 3Z ▼ 11 Elo | 54.3 | 1709 |
| 11 P KLINGLER SUI ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1922 | 2Z ▼ 29 Elo | 1Z ▼ 25 Elo | 1Z ▼ 15 Elo | 3Z ▼ 28 Elo | 39.7 | 1825 |
| 12 A JOHNSON USA ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1737 | 3Z ▼ 31 Elo | 2Z ▼ 38 Elo | 1Z ▲ 0 Elo | 7Z ▼ 29 Elo | 39.1 | 1639 |
| 13 C DURIF FRA ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1809 | 1Z ▼ 7 Elo | 1Z ▼ 25 Elo | 3Z ▼ 46 Elo | - ▼ 34 Elo | 29.8 | 1706 |
| 14 E PONZO FRA ▲ 6 better than predicted | 1498 | 1Z ▲ 18 Elo | 1Z ▲ 4 Elo | 4Z ▼ 9 Elo | - ▼ 11 Elo | 29.7 | 1503 |
| 15 A PAYNE USA ▬ | 1915 | 4Z ▼ 55 Elo | 1Z ▼ 20 Elo | 3Z ▼ 36 Elo | - ▼ 29 Elo | 29.5 | 1783 |
| 15 M SANDOZ FRA ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1867 | 2Z ▼ 21 Elo | 1Z ▼ 18 Elo | 5Z ▼ 53 Elo | - ▼ 24 Elo | 29.5 | 1757 |
| 17 M HAYES USA ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1700 | 6Z ▼ 48 Elo | 1Z ▼ 7 Elo | 5Z ▼ 25 Elo | - ▼ 18 Elo | 29.1 | 1607 |
| 18 S SA KOR ▼ 12 worse than predicted | 1952 | - ▼ 46 Elo | 1Z ▼ 21 Elo | 3Z ▼ 36 Elo | - ▼ 33 Elo | 19.8 | 1840 |
| 19 A ONOE JPN ▼ 7 worse than predicted | 1885 | - ▼ 38 Elo | 1Z ▼ 17 Elo | 4Z ▼ 35 Elo | - ▼ 26 Elo | 19.7 | 1789 |
| 20 M MARTIN USA ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1703 | 3Z ▼ 7 Elo | - ▼ 41 Elo | 6Z ▼ 19 Elo | - ▼ 13 Elo | 19.3 | 1643 |