Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S1
Z: (19) 1513 ■ T: (13) 1763 ■
S3
Z: (15) 1766 ■ T: (02) 1999 ■
S2
Z: (14) 1823 ■ T: (07) 1947 ■
S4
Z: (11) 1800 ■ T: (10) 1818 ■
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1513 | 2 1947 | 3 1999 | 4 1800 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 J WURM GER at home ▲ 3 better than predicted | 2147 | 1Z 1T ▲ 0 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 1 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 2 Elo | 1Z 2T ▼ 9 Elo | 99.9 | 2141 |
| 2 A NOGUCHI JPN ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 2322 | 1Z 1T ▲ 0 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 0 Elo | 2Z ▼ 29 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 1 Elo | 84.9 | 2294 |
| 3 S COXSEY GBR ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 2142 | 1Z 2T ▼ 9 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 1 Elo | 1Z ▼ 17 Elo | 3Z 3T ▼ 43 Elo | 84.5 | 2074 |
| 4 M TRACY GBR ▲ 11 better than predicted | 1850 | 1Z 2T ▼ 10 Elo | 5Z 5T ▼ 90 Elo | 3Z ▼ 37 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 17 Elo | 83.9 | 1730 |
| 5 M RETSCHY GER at home ▲ 5 better than predicted | 2102 | 1Z ▼ 28 Elo | 1Z 2T ▼ 11 Elo | 1Z ▼ 29 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 4 Elo | 69.9 | 2038 |
| 6 P KLINGLER SUI ▲ 2 better than predicted | 2079 | 1Z 1T ▲ 2 Elo | 1Z ▼ 31 Elo | 3Z ▼ 62 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 27 Elo | 69.6 | 1961 |
| 7 F GIBERT FRA ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 2089 | 1Z ▼ 37 Elo | 3Z 3T ▼ 55 Elo | 2Z ▼ 39 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 7 Elo | 69.5 | 1965 |
| 8 A PUCCIO USA ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 2102 | 1Z 1T ▲ 1 Elo | 1Z ▼ 26 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 5 Elo | - ▼ 72 Elo | 60.0 | 2028 |
| 9 M MARKOVIC SLO ▲ 8 better than predicted | 1742 | 1Z 2T ▼ 3 Elo | - ▼ 37 Elo | 1Z ▼ 3 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 19 Elo | 59.9 | 1729 |
| 10 M L.NEVE FRA ▲ 1 better than predicted | 2025 | 1Z 1T ▲ 3 Elo | 3Z ▼ 64 Elo | - ▼ 62 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 8 Elo | 59.8 | 1928 |
| 11 C CAULIER BEL ▲ 9 better than predicted | 1755 | 1Z ▼ 22 Elo | 2Z ▼ 12 Elo | 4Z ▼ 32 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 19 Elo | 54.6 | 1708 |
| 12 Y ABRAMCHUK RUS ▲ 7 better than predicted | 1822 | 2Z ▼ 42 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 20 Elo | 4Z ▼ 40 Elo | 3Z ▼ 40 Elo | 54.4 | 1720 |
| 13 M THÉVENET FRA ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 2043 | 1Z 1T ▲ 3 Elo | - ▼ 62 Elo | 1Z ▼ 20 Elo | - ▼ 64 Elo | 35.0 | 1932 |
| 13 M SANDOZ FRA ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1928 | 1Z 1T ▲ 5 Elo | - ▼ 54 Elo | 1Z ▼ 13 Elo | - ▼ 59 Elo | 35.0 | 1837 |
| 15 K SAURWEIN AUT ▼ 8 worse than predicted | 2019 | 1Z 1T ▲ 3 Elo | - ▼ 58 Elo | 2Z ▼ 32 Elo | - ▼ 61 Elo | 34.9 | 1903 |
| 15 M NONAKA JPN ▼ 13 worse than predicted | 2202 | 1Z 1T ▲ 0 Elo | 2Z ▼ 25 Elo | - ▼ 35 Elo | - ▼ 36 Elo | 34.9 | 2125 |
| 17 J KRUDER SLO ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1810 | 1Z 3T ▼ 23 Elo | - ▼ 47 Elo | - ▼ 42 Elo | - ▼ 53 Elo | 24.8 | 1687 |
| 18 C DURIF FRA ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 1855 | - ▼ 92 Elo | 2Z ▼ 15 Elo | 1Z ▼ 1 Elo | - ▼ 57 Elo | 19.9 | 1731 |
| 19 J LAVARDA ITA ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1797 | 1Z ▼ 20 Elo | 3Z ▼ 17 Elo | - ▼ 28 Elo | - ▼ 34 Elo | 19.8 | 1717 |
| 20 S BACHER AUT ▼ 6 worse than predicted | 1851 | 2Z ▼ 39 Elo | - ▼ 31 Elo | - ▼ 31 Elo | - ▼ 34 Elo | 9.9 | 1744 |