Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S2
Z: (12) 1937 ■ T: (06) 2114 ■
S4
Z: (09) 2042 ■ T: (02) 2219 ■
S1
Z: (20) 1662 ■ T: (15) 1895 ■
S3
Z: (19) 1715 ■ T: (01) 2249 ■
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1895 | 2 1937 | 3 2249 | 4 2219 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 A PUCCIO USA ▲ 5 better than predicted | 2051 | 1Z 1T ▲ 11 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 19 Elo | 1Z ▼ 9 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 23 Elo | 85.0 | 2095 |
| 2 J WURM GER ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1933 | 1Z 1T ▲ 17 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 24 Elo | 1Z ▼ 1 Elo | 3Z 3T ▲ 3 Elo | 84.6 | 1976 |
| 3 A NOGUCHI JPN ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1939 | 1Z 1T ▲ 16 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 17 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 18 Elo | - ▼ 26 Elo | 74.8 | 1972 |
| 4 S COXSEY GBR ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1915 | 1Z 2T ▲ 6 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 25 Elo | 1Z ▼ 1 Elo | 2Z ▼ 2 Elo | 69.8 | 1943 |
| 5 A STÖHR AUT ▼ 2 worse than predicted | 1943 | 1Z 1T ▲ 15 Elo | 2Z 3T ▼ 1 Elo | 1Z ▼ 1 Elo | 2Z ▼ 4 Elo | 69.6 | 1952 |
| 6 M MARKOVIC SLO ▲ 9 better than predicted | 1856 | 1Z 1T ▲ 18 Elo | 2Z 4T ▲ 5 Elo | 1Z ▲ 3 Elo | - ▼ 18 Elo | 59.6 | 1870 |
| 7 D FAKHRITDIN. RUS ▲ 3 better than predicted | 1891 | 1Z 2T ▲ 5 Elo | 1Z ▲ 0 Elo | 1Z ▲ 2 Elo | 3Z ▼ 7 Elo | 54.7 | 1891 |
| 8 M RETSCHY GER ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1874 | 2Z 3T ▼ 20 Elo | 1Z ▲ 4 Elo | 1Z ▲ 2 Elo | 4Z ▼ 7 Elo | 54.4 | 1853 |
| 9 O IAKOVLEVA RUS ▲ 7 better than predicted | 1875 | 1Z 2T ▲ 5 Elo | 2Z ▼ 7 Elo | 1Z ▲ 2 Elo | - ▼ 17 Elo | 44.8 | 1864 |
| 9 F GIBERT FRA ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 1587 | 1Z 2T ▲ 26 Elo | - ▼ 8 Elo | 1Z ▲ 12 Elo | 2Z ▲ 15 Elo | 44.8 | 1635 |
| 9 M THÉVENET FRA ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1620 | 1Z 1T ▲ 45 Elo | - ▼ 16 Elo | 1Z ▲ 19 Elo | 3Z ▲ 17 Elo | 44.8 | 1690 |
| 12 M ODA JPN ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1827 | 1Z 1T ▲ 18 Elo | 4Z ▼ 15 Elo | 1Z ▲ 4 Elo | - ▼ 14 Elo | 44.7 | 1825 |
| 12 M LESLIE-WUJ. GBR ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1814 | 2Z 3T ▼ 11 Elo | 1Z ▲ 7 Elo | 1Z ▲ 4 Elo | - ▼ 14 Elo | 44.7 | 1805 |
| 14 K SAURWEIN AUT ▼ 7 worse than predicted | 1846 | 1Z 2T ▲ 5 Elo | - ▼ 23 Elo | 1Z ▲ 3 Elo | 4Z ▼ 5 Elo | 44.6 | 1834 |
| 15 T S. RUS ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1698 | 1Z 3T ▲ 13 Elo | 3Z ▲ 1 Elo | 5Z ▼ 26 Elo | - ▼ 8 Elo | 44.2 | 1681 |
| 16 S BACHER AUT ▼ 4 worse than predicted | 1743 | 1Z ▼ 5 Elo | - ▼ 15 Elo | 1Z ▲ 8 Elo | - ▼ 9 Elo | 20.0 | 1730 |
| 16 E REKABI IRI ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1693 | 1Z ▼ 2 Elo | - ▼ 18 Elo | 1Z ▲ 14 Elo | - ▼ 10 Elo | 20.0 | 1687 |
| 16 E KIPRIIANOV. RUS ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1792 | 1Z ▼ 14 Elo | - ▼ 26 Elo | 1Z ▲ 9 Elo | - ▼ 15 Elo | 20.0 | 1760 |
| 19 G MCKEEHAN USA ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1653 | 2Z ▼ 11 Elo | - ▼ 12 Elo | 4Z ▼ 17 Elo | - ▼ 6 Elo | 19.6 | 1613 |
| 20 V ZIJLSTRA NED ▼ 9 worse than predicted | 1707 | 2Z ▼ 12 Elo | - ▼ 11 Elo | - ▼ 20 Elo | - ▼ 6 Elo | 9.9 | 1673 |