Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
F3
Z: (02) 1865 ■ T: (02) 1853 ■
F4
Z: (03) 1660 ■ T: (02) 1752 ■
F1
Z: (02) 1869 ■ T: (02) 1857 ■
F2
Z: (05) 1533 ■ T: (05) 1599 ■
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1857 | 2 1599 | 3 1865 | 4 1660 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 J HOJER GER ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1795 | 7Z 7T ▼ 89 Elo | 1Z 2T ▼ 5 Elo | 7Z 7T ▼ 62 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 14 Elo | 95.8 | 1653 |
| 2 D SHARAFUTDI. RUS ▲ 1 better than predicted | 1869 | 3Z 3T ▼ 27 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 6 Elo | - ▼ 48 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 13 Elo | 74.6 | 1825 |
| 3 J VERHOEVEN NED ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1758 | - ▼ 32 Elo | 2Z 2T ▼ 20 Elo | 7Z 7T ▼ 46 Elo | - ▼ 38 Elo | 48.6 | 1639 |
| 4 G G.MONDET FRA ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1794 | - ▼ 33 Elo | 1Z 3T ▼ 22 Elo | - ▼ 28 Elo | 1Z ▼ 12 Elo | 34.8 | 1713 |
| 5 J KASSAY AUS ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1634 | - ▼ 20 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 15 Elo | - ▼ 18 Elo | - ▼ 32 Elo | 25.0 | 1596 |
| 6 V TIMONOV RUS ▬ | 1597 | - ▼ 22 Elo | - ▼ 62 Elo | - ▼ 16 Elo | - ▼ 32 Elo | 0.0 | 1500 |