Competition results are pulled after the event concludes.
Problem difficulties are calculated based on the Elo of athletes that did/didn't climb them.
If a competition has been fully analysed problem features will also be shown for semi-finals and finals.
Problems Zones/Tops (success count) difficulty
S3
Z: (16) 1583 ■ T: (00) 1972 ■
S2
Z: (20) 1394 ■ T: (07) 1814 ■
S1
Z: (20) 1803 ■ T: (19) 1704 ■
S4
Z: (14) 1694 ■ T: (03) 1883 ■
Each athlete's attempts, zones and tops have been converted into Elo match-ups with the problem. This will lead to either a gain or loss in Elo.
The problem receives the opposite effect.
The expected position is based on the athlete Elo going into the competition.
| Athlete | Pre-Elo | 1 1803 | 2 1394 | 3 1583 | 4 1883 | Event Score | Post-Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 A STÖHR AUT ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1881 | 1Z 1T ▲ 3 Elo | 1Z 2T ▼ 7 Elo | 1Z ▼ 19 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 11 Elo | 84.9 | 1869 |
| 2 J KIM KOR ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1787 | 5Z 5T ▼ 159 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 26 Elo | 3Z ▼ 38 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 25 Elo | 83.9 | 1641 |
| 3 C AVEZOU FRA at home ▲ 9 better than predicted | 1596 | 1Z 1T ▲ 18 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 17 Elo | 1Z ▲ 0 Elo | 1Z ▼ 6 Elo | 70.0 | 1625 |
| 4 A NOGUCHI JPN ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1913 | 2Z 2T ▼ 30 Elo | 1Z ▼ 28 Elo | 1Z ▼ 16 Elo | 1Z 1T ▲ 11 Elo | 69.8 | 1850 |
| 5 M SANDOZ FRA at home ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1814 | 3Z 3T ▼ 53 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 0 Elo | 1Z ▼ 8 Elo | 2Z ▼ 28 Elo | 69.4 | 1725 |
| 6 P KLINGLER SUI ▲ 7 better than predicted | 1706 | 3Z 3T ▼ 47 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 12 Elo | 1Z ▼ 3 Elo | 4Z ▼ 58 Elo | 69.2 | 1610 |
| 7 O IAKOVLEVA RUS ▲ 4 better than predicted | 1671 | 1Z 1T ▲ 20 Elo | 2Z 3T ▼ 25 Elo | - ▼ 51 Elo | 1Z ▼ 9 Elo | 59.7 | 1625 |
| 8 B BACHER AUT ▲ 12 better than predicted | 1460 | 3Z 3T ▲ 10 Elo | 1Z 2T ▲ 31 Elo | 2Z ▲ 0 Elo | - ▼ 31 Elo | 59.4 | 1481 |
| 9 Y CHERESHNEV. RUS ▲ 6 better than predicted | 1554 | 3Z 3T ▲ 0 Elo | 3Z ▼ 38 Elo | 1Z ▲ 15 Elo | 1Z ▲ 12 Elo | 54.4 | 1543 |
| 10 A PUCCIO USA ▼ 5 worse than predicted | 1914 | 2Z 2T ▼ 27 Elo | 1Z ▼ 29 Elo | 3Z ▼ 44 Elo | 3Z ▼ 43 Elo | 54.4 | 1771 |
| 11 K SAURWEIN AUT ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1687 | 3Z 3T ▼ 21 Elo | 1Z ▼ 10 Elo | 4Z ▼ 28 Elo | 3Z ▼ 14 Elo | 54.1 | 1614 |
| 12 A PAYNE USA ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1578 | 7Z 7T ▼ 65 Elo | 1Z ▲ 1 Elo | 2Z ▲ 6 Elo | 3Z ▲ 0 Elo | 53.5 | 1520 |
| 13 T ULZHABAYEV. KAZ ▲ 5 better than predicted | 1397 | 7Z 7T ▲ 2 Elo | 1Z ▲ 9 Elo | 2Z ▲ 14 Elo | 3Z ▲ 11 Elo | 52.7 | 1433 |
| 14 J WURM GER ▼ 12 worse than predicted | 1889 | 2Z 2T ▼ 24 Elo | 1Z ▼ 27 Elo | 2Z ▼ 26 Elo | - ▼ 48 Elo | 44.7 | 1778 |
| 15 O BIBIK RUS ▲ 2 better than predicted | 1558 | 3Z 3T ▲ 2 Elo | 1Z ▼ 3 Elo | 1Z ▲ 11 Elo | - ▼ 29 Elo | 44.6 | 1549 |
| 15 M L.NEVE FRA at home ▼ 13 worse than predicted | 1895 | 2Z 2T ▼ 24 Elo | 2Z ▼ 43 Elo | 2Z ▼ 25 Elo | - ▼ 44 Elo | 44.6 | 1772 |
| 17 M RETSCHY GER ▼ 7 worse than predicted | 1666 | 2Z 2T ▲ 0 Elo | 1Z ▼ 12 Elo | - ▼ 27 Elo | 5Z ▼ 29 Elo | 44.4 | 1608 |
| 18 A GALLYAMOVA RUS ▼ 11 worse than predicted | 1881 | 7Z ▼ 130 Elo | 1Z ▼ 22 Elo | 1Z ▼ 3 Elo | 3Z ▼ 33 Elo | 39.0 | 1693 |
| 19 H MIDTBOE NOR ▼ 3 worse than predicted | 1472 | 3Z 3T ▲ 18 Elo | 1Z ▲ 3 Elo | - ▼ 23 Elo | - ▼ 20 Elo | 34.6 | 1466 |
| 20 J LAVARDA ITA ▼ 1 worse than predicted | 1470 | 3Z 3T ▲ 16 Elo | 2Z ▼ 12 Elo | - ▼ 21 Elo | - ▼ 18 Elo | 34.5 | 1450 |